FEDERAL · 21 U.S.C. · Chapter 10
Inspection in official establishments
21 U.S.C. § 455
Title21 — Food and Drugs
Chapter10 — POULTRY AND POULTRY PRODUCTS INSPECTION
This text of 21 U.S.C. § 455 (Inspection in official establishments) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
21 U.S.C. § 455.
Text
(a)Ante mortem inspection
For the purpose of preventing the entry into or flow or movement in commerce of, or the burdening of commerce by, any poultry product which is capable of use as human food and is adulterated, the Secretary shall, where and to the extent considered by him necessary, cause to be made by inspectors ante mortem inspection of poultry in each official establishment processing poultry or poultry products for commerce or otherwise subject to inspection under this chapter.
(b)Post mortem inspection; quarantine, segregation, and reinspection
The Secretary, whenever processing operations are being conducted, shall cause to be made by inspectors post mortem inspection of the carcass of each bird processed, and at any time such quarantine, segregation, and reinspection as he
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Edward M. Farguson v. Mbank Houston, N.A.
808 F.2d 358 (Fifth Circuit, 1986)
Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Thomas Vilsack
808 F.3d 905 (D.C. Circuit, 2015)
Coghlan v. Starkey
852 F.2d 806 (Fifth Circuit, 1988)
Mississippi Poultry Association, Inc. v. Edward R. Madigan, Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture
31 F.3d 293 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)
Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Vilsack
79 F. Supp. 3d 174 (District of Columbia, 2015)
Association Des Éleveurs De Canards Et D'Oies Du Québec v. Becerra
870 F.3d 1140 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
American Federation of Government Employees v. Veneman
284 F.3d 125 (D.C. Circuit, 2002)
American Public Health Association v. Earl Butz, Secretary of Department of Agriculture
511 F.2d 331 (D.C. Circuit, 1975)
American Federation of Government Employees v. Glickman
215 F.3d 7 (D.C. Circuit, 2000)
Original Honey Baked Ham Co. of Georgia, Inc. v. Glickman
172 F.3d 885 (D.C. Circuit, 1999)
Amer Fed Govt Empl v. Veneman, Ann M.
284 F.3d 125 (D.C. Circuit, 2002)
American Federation of Government Employees v. Glickman
127 F. Supp. 2d 243 (District of Columbia, 2001)
Pond v. Doe
(W.D. Washington, 2022)
Malberg v. Cashen
(N.D. California, 2022)
(PC) Bennett v. Monroe Detention Center
(E.D. California, 2024)
Animal Welfare Institute v. Perdue
(W.D. New York, 2022)
Farm Sanctuary v. United States Department of Agriculture
(W.D. New York, 2023)
Mississippi Poultry Ass'n, Inc. v. Madigan
(Fifth Circuit, 1994)
Alvarez v. Morris-Shea Bridge Company, Inc.
(E.D. California, 2024)
Ketschau v. United States of America
(W.D. Washington, 2022)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 85–172, §6, Aug. 28, 1957, 71 Stat. 443; Pub. L. 90–492, §6, Aug. 18, 1968, 82 Stat. 798.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1968—Par. (a). Pub. L. 90–492, §6(a), substituted "of, or the burdening of commerce by, any poultry product which is capable of use as human food and is adulterated," for "or a designated major consuming area of any poultry product which is unwholesome or adulterated," "each official establishment" for "any official establishment", and "otherwise subject to inspection under this chapter" for "in, or for marketing in a designated city or area".
Par. (b). Pub. L. 90–492, §6(b), substituted "segregation, and reinspection" for "segregation, reinspection", and "otherwise subject to inspection under this chapter" for "in, or for marketing in a designated city or area", and inserted "capable of use as human food" after "necessary of poultry and poultry products".
Par. (c). Pub. L. 90–492, §6(c), inserted "other" before "poultry products", and substituted "to be adulterated" for "to be unwholesome or adulterated", "made not adulterated" for "made not unwholesome and not adulterated", and "to be not adulterated" for "to be not unwholesome and not adulterated".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1968 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 90–492 effective Aug. 18, 1968, see section 20 of Pub. L. 90–492, set out as a note under section 451 of this title.
Applicability of Chapter Requirements to Birds of the Order Ratitae
Pub. L. 106–387, §1(a) [title VII, §752], Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1549, 1549A–41, provided that: "Effective 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 28, 2000] and continuing for the remainder of fiscal year 2001 and each subsequent fiscal year, establishments in the United States that slaughter or process birds of the order Ratitae, such as ostriches, emus and rheas, and squab, for distribution in commerce as human food shall be subject to the ante mortem and post mortem inspection, reinspection, and sanitation requirements of the Poultry Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 451 et seq.) rather than the voluntary poultry inspection program of the Department of Agriculture under section 203 of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1622)."
Amendments
1968—Par. (a). Pub. L. 90–492, §6(a), substituted "of, or the burdening of commerce by, any poultry product which is capable of use as human food and is adulterated," for "or a designated major consuming area of any poultry product which is unwholesome or adulterated," "each official establishment" for "any official establishment", and "otherwise subject to inspection under this chapter" for "in, or for marketing in a designated city or area".
Par. (b). Pub. L. 90–492, §6(b), substituted "segregation, and reinspection" for "segregation, reinspection", and "otherwise subject to inspection under this chapter" for "in, or for marketing in a designated city or area", and inserted "capable of use as human food" after "necessary of poultry and poultry products".
Par. (c). Pub. L. 90–492, §6(c), inserted "other" before "poultry products", and substituted "to be adulterated" for "to be unwholesome or adulterated", "made not adulterated" for "made not unwholesome and not adulterated", and "to be not adulterated" for "to be not unwholesome and not adulterated".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1968 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 90–492 effective Aug. 18, 1968, see section 20 of Pub. L. 90–492, set out as a note under section 451 of this title.
Applicability of Chapter Requirements to Birds of the Order Ratitae
Pub. L. 106–387, §1(a) [title VII, §752], Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1549, 1549A–41, provided that: "Effective 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 28, 2000] and continuing for the remainder of fiscal year 2001 and each subsequent fiscal year, establishments in the United States that slaughter or process birds of the order Ratitae, such as ostriches, emus and rheas, and squab, for distribution in commerce as human food shall be subject to the ante mortem and post mortem inspection, reinspection, and sanitation requirements of the Poultry Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 451 et seq.) rather than the voluntary poultry inspection program of the Department of Agriculture under section 203 of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1622)."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
21 U.S.C. § 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/21/455.