FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 205
Implied consent for certain tests
18 U.S.C. § 3118
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter205 — SEARCHES AND SEIZURES
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 3118 (Implied consent for certain tests) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 3118.
Text
(a)Consent.—Whoever operates a motor vehicle in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States consents thereby to a chemical test or tests of such person's blood, breath, or urine, if arrested for any offense arising from such person's driving while under the influence of a drug or alcohol in such jurisdiction. The test or tests shall be administered upon the request of a police officer having reasonable grounds to believe the person arrested to have been driving a motor vehicle upon the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States while under the influence of drugs or alcohol in violation of the laws of a State, territory, possession, or district.
(b)Effect of Refusal.—Whoever, having consented to a test or tests by reason of subsection (a)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory Council
506 U.S. 194 (Supreme Court, 1993)
United States v. Moran
65 M.J. 178 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2007)
United States v. Daniel G. Chapel
55 F.3d 1416 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Prasit Imngren, United States of America v. Kenneth Johnson
98 F.3d 811 (Fourth Circuit, 1996)
State, Department of Motor Vehicles & Public Safety v. Lovett
874 P.2d 1247 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1994)
James Rowland, Former Director, California Department of Corrections v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory Council
506 U.S. 19 (Supreme Court, 1993)
United States v. Pond
36 M.J. 1050 (U S Air Force Court of Military Review, 1993)
United States v. Sauls
981 F. Supp. 909 (D. Maryland, 1997)
United States v. Imngren
914 F. Supp. 1326 (E.D. Virginia, 1995)
United States v. Love
141 F.R.D. 315 (D. Colorado, 1992)
Brune v. Administrative Director of the Courts
130 P.3d 1037 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2006)
United States v. Dillon
983 F. Supp. 1037 (D. Kansas, 1997)
United States v. Swift Hawk
125 F. Supp. 2d 384 (D. South Dakota, 2000)
United States v. Rogers
926 F. Supp. 1000 (D. Colorado, 1996)
United States v. Scott
188 F. App'x 213 (Fourth Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Wight
884 F. Supp. 400 (D. Colorado, 1995)
United States v. Sugiyama
113 F. Supp. 3d 784 (D. Maryland, 2015)
United States v. Van Hazel
468 F. Supp. 2d 792 (E.D. North Carolina, 2006)
United States v. Mason
143 F. Supp. 2d 1241 (D. Colorado, 2001)
United States v. Hopp
943 F. Supp. 1313 (D. Colorado, 1996)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 100–690, title VI, §6477(b)(1), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4381, §3117; renumbered §3118, Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXV, §3574, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4929.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1990—Pub. L. 101–647 renumbered second section 3117 of this title as this section.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1988—Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §§7068, 7092(c), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4405, 4411, substituted "trap and trace" for "trap or trace" in item 3123, added item 3125, and redesignated former items 3125 and 3126 as 3126 and 3127, respectively.
Amendments
1990—Pub. L. 101–647 renumbered second section 3117 of this title as this section.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1988—Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §§7068, 7092(c), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4405, 4411, substituted "trap and trace" for "trap or trace" in item 3123, added item 3125, and redesignated former items 3125 and 3126 as 3126 and 3127, respectively.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 3118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/3118.