FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 203
Preliminary examination
18 U.S.C. § 3060
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter203 — ARREST AND COMMITMENT
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 3060 (Preliminary examination) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 3060.
Text
(a)Except as otherwise provided by this section, a preliminary examination shall be held within the time set by the judge or magistrate judge pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, to determine whether there is probable cause to believe that an offense has been committed and that the arrested person has committed it.
(b)The date for the preliminary examination shall be fixed by the judge or magistrate judge at the initial appearance of the arrested person. Except as provided by subsection (c) of this section, or unless the arrested person waives the preliminary examination, such examination shall be held within a reasonable time following initial appearance, but in any event not later than—
(1)the fourteenth day following the date of the initial appearance of the arrested person be
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Adams v. Illinois
405 U.S. 278 (Supreme Court, 1972)
United States v. William N. Anderson
481 F.2d 685 (Fourth Circuit, 1973)
Lawrence D. Coleman v. The Honorable Arthur L. Burnett, United States Magistrate for the District of Columbia
477 F.2d 1187 (D.C. Circuit, 1973)
Craig John Maisonville, and James M. Dombroski v. F2 America, Inc. F2 International, Inc.
902 F.2d 746 (Ninth Circuit, 1990)
United States v. Soriano-Jarquin
492 F.3d 495 (Fourth Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Joaquin Augusto Diaz and Jose Guillermo Guapacha
922 F.2d 998 (Second Circuit, 1990)
United States v. Nelson Cruz
478 F.2d 408 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)
United States v. Dorothy Cox, United States of America v. Anthony Marra, United States of America v. Mary Perkins
752 F.2d 741 (First Circuit, 1985)
Tpo, Incorporated v. Hon. Thomas R. McMillen
460 F.2d 348 (Seventh Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Keith Farries, In
459 F.2d 1057 (Third Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Ronald Anthony Milano
443 F.2d 1022 (Tenth Circuit, 1971)
United States v. Timmy Lee Brumley
466 F.2d 911 (Tenth Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Alexander English
501 F.2d 1254 (Seventh Circuit, 1974)
United States v. Beacher Drell Roach
590 F.2d 181 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)
Waugh v. State
564 S.W.2d 654 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1978)
United States v. Aranda-Hernandez
95 F.3d 977 (Tenth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Thomas Francis King, (Two Cases)
482 F.2d 768 (D.C. Circuit, 1973)
United States v. Frank E. Crutchley, and Florence Gorman
502 F.2d 1195 (Third Circuit, 1974)
United States v. Gambale
610 F. Supp. 1515 (D. Massachusetts, 1985)
Commonwealth v. Brabham
309 A.2d 824 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1973)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 819; Pub. L. 90–578, title III, §303(a), Oct. 17, 1968, 82 Stat. 1117; Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §321, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5117; Pub. L. 109–162, title XI, §1179, Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3126; Pub. L. 111–16, §3(9), May 7, 2009, 123 Stat. 1608.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2009—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 111–16 substituted "fourteenth day" for "tenth day".
2006—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 109–162 substituted "In the absence of such consent of the accused, the judge or magistrate judge may extend the time limits only on a showing that extraordinary circumstances exist and justice requires the delay." for "In the absence of such consent of the accused, the date fixed for the preliminary hearing may be a date later than that prescribed by subsection (b), or may be continued to a date subsequent to the date initially fixed therefor, only upon the order of a judge of the appropriate United States district court after a finding that extraordinary circumstances exist, and that the delay of the preliminary hearing is indispensable to the interests of justice."
1968—Pub. L. 90–578 substituted provisions of subsecs. (a) to (f) of this section detailing preliminary examination content for prior provisions which directed attention to the rule in section catchline, and directed one to see Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, including "Proceedings before commissioner, appearance, advice as to right to counsel, hearing, Rule 5.".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Change of Name
Words "magistrate judge" and "United States magistrate judges" substituted for "magistrate" and "United States magistrates", respectively, wherever appearing in text pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as a note under section 631 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Effective Date of 2009 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 111–16 effective Dec. 1, 2009, see section 7 of Pub. L. 111–16, set out as a note under section 109 of Title 11, Bankruptcy.
Effective Date of 1968 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 90–578 effective Oct. 17, 1968, except when a later effective date is applicable, which is the earlier of date when implementation of amendment by appointment of magistrates [now United States magistrate judges] and assumption of office takes place or third anniversary of enactment of Pub. L. 90–578 on Oct. 17, 1968, see section 403 of Pub. L. 90–578, set out as a note under section 631 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Amendments
2009—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 111–16 substituted "fourteenth day" for "tenth day".
2006—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 109–162 substituted "In the absence of such consent of the accused, the judge or magistrate judge may extend the time limits only on a showing that extraordinary circumstances exist and justice requires the delay." for "In the absence of such consent of the accused, the date fixed for the preliminary hearing may be a date later than that prescribed by subsection (b), or may be continued to a date subsequent to the date initially fixed therefor, only upon the order of a judge of the appropriate United States district court after a finding that extraordinary circumstances exist, and that the delay of the preliminary hearing is indispensable to the interests of justice."
1968—Pub. L. 90–578 substituted provisions of subsecs. (a) to (f) of this section detailing preliminary examination content for prior provisions which directed attention to the rule in section catchline, and directed one to see Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, including "Proceedings before commissioner, appearance, advice as to right to counsel, hearing, Rule 5.".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Change of Name
Words "magistrate judge" and "United States magistrate judges" substituted for "magistrate" and "United States magistrates", respectively, wherever appearing in text pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as a note under section 631 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Effective Date of 2009 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 111–16 effective Dec. 1, 2009, see section 7 of Pub. L. 111–16, set out as a note under section 109 of Title 11, Bankruptcy.
Effective Date of 1968 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 90–578 effective Oct. 17, 1968, except when a later effective date is applicable, which is the earlier of date when implementation of amendment by appointment of magistrates [now United States magistrate judges] and assumption of office takes place or third anniversary of enactment of Pub. L. 90–578 on Oct. 17, 1968, see section 403 of Pub. L. 90–578, set out as a note under section 631 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 3060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/3060.