FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 51
Misconduct or neglect of ship officers
18 U.S.C. § 1115
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter51 — HOMICIDE
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 1115 (Misconduct or neglect of ship officers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 1115.
Text
Every captain, engineer, pilot, or other person employed on any steamboat or vessel, by whose misconduct, negligence, or inattention to his duties on such vessel the life of any person is destroyed, and every owner, charterer, inspector, or other public officer, through whose fraud, neglect, connivance, misconduct, or violation of law the life of any person is destroyed, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
When the owner or charterer of any steamboat or vessel is a corporation, any executive officer of such corporation, for the time being actually charged with the control and management of the operation, equipment, or navigation of such steamboat or vessel, who has knowingly and willfully caused or allowed such fraud, neglect, connivance, miscond
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
C.F. Bean L.L.C. v. Suzuki Motor Corp.
841 F.3d 365 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Roseboro
551 F.3d 226 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Robert Kaluza
780 F.3d 647 (Fifth Circuit, 2015)
United States v. Gilbert Charles Thurston
362 F.3d 1319 (Eleventh Circuit, 2004)
United States v. David C. Hilger
867 F.2d 566 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)
United States v. LaBrecque
419 F. Supp. 430 (D. New Jersey, 1976)
United States v. O'Keefe
426 F.3d 274 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Weng Yu Hui
83 F.3d 592 (Second Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Lee Peng Fei, AKA Ma Lee, AKA Char Lee
225 F.3d 167 (Second Circuit, 2000)
Hartford Fire Insurance v. Mitlof
208 F. Supp. 2d 407 (S.D. New York, 2002)
United States v. The Allied Towing Corporation
602 F.2d 612 (Fourth Circuit, 1979)
United States v. Egan Marine Corp.
843 F.3d 674 (Seventh Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Ryan
365 F. Supp. 2d 338 (E.D. New York, 2005)
Packgen v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
957 F. Supp. 2d 58 (D. Maine, 2013)
United States v. Oba
317 F. App'x 698 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Kenneth McKee
68 F.4th 1100 (Eighth Circuit, 2023)
United States v. Sheehan
89 F. App'x 307 (Second Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Mauricio Alvarez
(Eleventh Circuit, 2020)
Matter of Marine Engineers' Beneficial Assn. v. City of New York
2019 NY Slip Op 1327 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 757; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §461 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §282, 35 Stat. 1144).
Section restores the intent of the original enactments, R.S. §5344, and act Mar. 3, 1905, ch. 1454, §5, 33 Stat. 1025, and makes this section one of general application. In the Criminal Code of 1909, by placing it in chapter 11, limited to places within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, such original intent was inadvertently lost as indicated by the entire absence of report or comment on such limitation.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $10,000" in two places.
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §461 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §282, 35 Stat. 1144).
Section restores the intent of the original enactments, R.S. §5344, and act Mar. 3, 1905, ch. 1454, §5, 33 Stat. 1025, and makes this section one of general application. In the Criminal Code of 1909, by placing it in chapter 11, limited to places within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, such original intent was inadvertently lost as indicated by the entire absence of report or comment on such limitation.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $10,000" in two places.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 1115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/1115.