FEDERAL · 17 U.S.C. · Chapter 4
Registration of claim and issuance of certificate
17 U.S.C. § 410
Title17 — Copyrights
Chapter4 — COPYRIGHT NOTICE, DEPOSIT, AND REGISTRATION
This text of 17 U.S.C. § 410 (Registration of claim and issuance of certificate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
17 U.S.C. § 410.
Text
(a)When, after examination, the Register of Copyrights determines that, in accordance with the provisions of this title, the material deposited constitutes copyrightable subject matter and that the other legal and formal requirements of this title have been met, the Register shall register the claim and issue to the applicant a certificate of registration under the seal of the Copyright Office. The certificate shall contain the information given in the application, together with the number and effective date of the registration.
(b)In any case in which the Register of Copyrights determines that, in accordance with the provisions of this title, the material deposited does not constitute copyrightable subject matter or that the claim is invalid for any other reason, the Register shall refu
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jorgensen v. Epic/Sony Records
351 F.3d 46 (Second Circuit, 2003)
Original Appalachian Artworks, Inc. v. Toy Loft, Inc.
684 F.2d 821 (Eleventh Circuit, 1982)
Bateman v. Mnemonics, Inc.
79 F.3d 1532 (Eleventh Circuit, 1996)
Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits, Inc.
225 F.3d 1068 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
Harper House, Inc. v. Thomas Nelson, Inc.
889 F.2d 197 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)
La Resolana Architects, PA v. Clay Realtors Angel Fire
416 F.3d 1195 (Tenth Circuit, 2005)
CMM Cable Rep, Inc. v. Ocean Coast Properties, Inc.
97 F.3d 1504 (First Circuit, 1996)
Southco, Inc. v. Kanebridge Corporation
390 F.3d 276 (Third Circuit, 2004)
Entertainment Research Group, Inc. v. Genesis Creative Group, Inc.
122 F.3d 1211 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
Buddy Webster v. Dean Guitars
955 F.3d 1270 (Eleventh Circuit, 2020)
Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. Pak China Group Co.
843 F. Supp. 2d 1284 (S.D. Florida, 2012)
Digby Adler Group LLC v. Image Rent a Car, Inc.
79 F. Supp. 3d 1095 (N.D. California, 2015)
Alaska Stock, LLC v. Pearson Education, Inc.
975 F. Supp. 2d 1027 (D. Alaska, 2013)
Textile Secrets International, Inc. v. Ya-Ya Brand Inc.
524 F. Supp. 2d 1184 (C.D. California, 2007)
Ganz Bros. Toys v. Midwest Importers of Cannon Falls, Inc.
834 F. Supp. 896 (E.D. Virginia, 1993)
Pem-America, Inc. v. Sunham Home Fashions, LLC
83 F. App'x 369 (Second Circuit, 2003)
Modern Publishing, A Division of Unisystems, Inc. v. Landoll, Inc.
841 F. Supp. 129 (S.D. New York, 1994)
Innovative Legal Marketing, LLC v. Market Masters-Legal
852 F. Supp. 2d 688 (E.D. Virginia, 2012)
Aqua Creations USA Inc. v. Hilton Worldwide, Inc.
487 F. App'x 627 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Montana Silversmiths, Inc. v. Taylor Brands, LLC
850 F. Supp. 2d 1172 (D. Montana, 2012)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 94–553, title I, §101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2582.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
house report no. 94–1476
The first two subsections of section 410 set forth the two basic duties of the Register of Copyrights with respect to copyright registration: (1) to register the claim and issue a certificate if the Register determines that "the material deposited constitutes copyrightable subject matter and that the other legal and formal requirements of this title have been met," and (2) to refuse registration and notify the applicant if the Register determines that "the material deposited does not constitute copyrightable subject matter or that the claim is invalid for any other reason."
Subsection (c) deals with the probative effect of a certificate of registration issued by the Register under subsection (a). Under its provisions, a certificate is required to be given prima facie weight in any judicial proceedings if the registration it covers was made "before or within five years after first publication of the work"; thereafter the court is given discretion to decide what evidentiary weight the certificate should be accorded. This five-year period is based on a recognition that the longer the lapse of time between publication and registration the less likely to be reliable are the facts stated in the certificate.
Under section 410(c), a certificate is to "constitute prima facie evidence of the validity of the copyright and of the facts stated in the certificate." The principle that a certificate represents prima facie evidence of copyright validity has been established in a long line of court decisions, and it is a sound one. It is true that, unlike a patent claim, a claim to copyright is not examined for basic validity before a certificate is issued. On the other hand, endowing a copyright claimant who has obtained a certificate with a rebuttable presumption of the validity of the copyright does not deprive the defendant in an infringement suit of any rights, it merely orders the burdens of proof. The plaintiff should not ordinarily be forced in the first instance to prove all of the multitude of facts that underline the validity of the copyright unless the defendant, by effectively challenging them, shifts the burden of doing so to the plaintiff.
Section 410(d), which is in accord with the present practice of the Copyright Office, makes the effective date of registration the day when an application, deposit, and fee "which are later determined by the Register of Copyrights or by a court of competent jurisdiction to be acceptable for registration" have all been received. Where the three necessary elements are received at different times the date of receipt of the last of them is controlling, regardless of when the Copyright Office acts on the claim. The provision not only takes account of the inevitable timelag between receipt of the application and other material and the issuance of the certificate, but it also recognizes the possibility that a court might later find the Register wrong in refusing registration.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Registration of Claims to Copyrights and Recordation of Assignments of Copyrights and Other Instruments Under Predecessor Provisions
Pub. L. 94–553, title I, §109, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2600, provided that: "The registration of claims to copyright for which the required deposit, application, and fee were received in the Copyright Office before January 1, 1978, and the recordation of assignments of copyright or other instruments received in the Copyright Office before January 1, 1978, shall be made in accordance with title 17 as it existed on December 31, 1977."
house report no. 94–1476
The first two subsections of section 410 set forth the two basic duties of the Register of Copyrights with respect to copyright registration: (1) to register the claim and issue a certificate if the Register determines that "the material deposited constitutes copyrightable subject matter and that the other legal and formal requirements of this title have been met," and (2) to refuse registration and notify the applicant if the Register determines that "the material deposited does not constitute copyrightable subject matter or that the claim is invalid for any other reason."
Subsection (c) deals with the probative effect of a certificate of registration issued by the Register under subsection (a). Under its provisions, a certificate is required to be given prima facie weight in any judicial proceedings if the registration it covers was made "before or within five years after first publication of the work"; thereafter the court is given discretion to decide what evidentiary weight the certificate should be accorded. This five-year period is based on a recognition that the longer the lapse of time between publication and registration the less likely to be reliable are the facts stated in the certificate.
Under section 410(c), a certificate is to "constitute prima facie evidence of the validity of the copyright and of the facts stated in the certificate." The principle that a certificate represents prima facie evidence of copyright validity has been established in a long line of court decisions, and it is a sound one. It is true that, unlike a patent claim, a claim to copyright is not examined for basic validity before a certificate is issued. On the other hand, endowing a copyright claimant who has obtained a certificate with a rebuttable presumption of the validity of the copyright does not deprive the defendant in an infringement suit of any rights, it merely orders the burdens of proof. The plaintiff should not ordinarily be forced in the first instance to prove all of the multitude of facts that underline the validity of the copyright unless the defendant, by effectively challenging them, shifts the burden of doing so to the plaintiff.
Section 410(d), which is in accord with the present practice of the Copyright Office, makes the effective date of registration the day when an application, deposit, and fee "which are later determined by the Register of Copyrights or by a court of competent jurisdiction to be acceptable for registration" have all been received. Where the three necessary elements are received at different times the date of receipt of the last of them is controlling, regardless of when the Copyright Office acts on the claim. The provision not only takes account of the inevitable timelag between receipt of the application and other material and the issuance of the certificate, but it also recognizes the possibility that a court might later find the Register wrong in refusing registration.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Registration of Claims to Copyrights and Recordation of Assignments of Copyrights and Other Instruments Under Predecessor Provisions
Pub. L. 94–553, title I, §109, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2600, provided that: "The registration of claims to copyright for which the required deposit, application, and fee were received in the Copyright Office before January 1, 1978, and the recordation of assignments of copyright or other instruments received in the Copyright Office before January 1, 1978, shall be made in accordance with title 17 as it existed on December 31, 1977."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
17 U.S.C. § 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/17/410.