FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter 98
Rules of professional responsibility for attorneys
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Title 15 — Commerce and Trade·Ch. 98 — PUBLIC COMPANY ACCOUNTING REFORM AND CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY·Subch. III
Not later than 180 days after July 30, 2002, the Commission shall issue rules, in the public interest and for the protection of investors, setting forth minimum standards of professional conduct for attorneys appearing and practicing before the Commission in any way in the representation of issuers, including a rule—
(1)requiring an attorney to report evidence of a material violation of securities law or breach of fiduciary duty or similar violation by the company or any agent thereof, to the chief legal counsel or the chief executive officer of the company (or the equivalent thereof); and
(2)if the counsel or officer does not appropriately respond to the evidence (adopting, as necessary, appropriate remedial measures or sanctions with respect to the violation), requiring the attorney to
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
15 U.S.C. § 7245 (Rules of professional responsibility for attorneys) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Van Asdale v. International Game Technology
577 F.3d 989 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Ruben Carnero v. Boston Scientific Corporation
433 F.3d 1 (First Circuit, 2005)
Lawson v. FMR LLC
134 S. Ct. 1158 (Supreme Court, 2014)
Hudes v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.
806 F. Supp. 2d 180 (District of Columbia, 2011)
New York State Bar Ass'n v. Federal Trade Commission
276 F. Supp. 2d 110 (District of Columbia, 2003)
Berman v. Neo@Ogilvy LLC
801 F.3d 145 (Second Circuit, 2015)
Lawson v. FMR LLC
724 F. Supp. 2d 141 (D. Massachusetts, 2010)
Miller v. McDonald (In Re World Health Alternatives, Inc.)
385 B.R. 576 (D. Delaware, 2008)
Somers v. Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
119 F. Supp. 3d 1088 (N.D. California, 2015)
Paul Somers v. Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
850 F.3d 1045 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
Wadler v. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
212 F. Supp. 3d 829 (N.D. California, 2016)
Magee v. The Walt Disney Company
(S.D. New York, 2021)
Van Asdale v. Intl Game Technology
(Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Carnero v. Boston Scientific
(First Circuit, 2006)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 107–204, title III, §307, July 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 784.)