FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter 1
Effect of partial invalidity
15 U.S.C. § 27
Title15 — Commerce and Trade
Chapter1 — MONOPOLIES AND COMBINATIONS IN RESTRAINT OF TRADE
This text of 15 U.S.C. § 27 (Effect of partial invalidity) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
15 U.S.C. § 27.
Text
If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Act shall, for any reason, be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph, or part thereof directly involved in the controversy in which such judgment shall have been rendered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Miller v. Indiana Hospital
562 F. Supp. 1259 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1983)
Iranian Shipping Lines, S.A. v. Moraites
377 F. Supp. 644 (S.D. New York, 1974)
Sakis v. United States
103 F. Supp. 292 (District of Columbia, 1952)
Jonathan L. Cline and Elizabeth A. Cline v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc. et al.
(E.D. California, 2025)
Anhar v. Citibank, N.A.
(E.D. California, 2021)
LifeVoxel Virginia SPV, LLC v. LifeVoxel.AI, Inc.
(S.D. California, 2022)
Facebook, Inc. v. Sahinturk
(N.D. California, 2022)
Jerome's Furniture Warehouse v. Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc.
(S.D. California, 2021)
Escamilla Avina v. Patenaude & Felix, APC
(S.D. California, 2021)
Camp v. Qualcomm Incorporated
(S.D. California, 2020)
Homelight, Inc. v. Shkipin
(N.D. California, 2022)
Hubbard v. Google LLC
(N.D. California, 2020)
Matthew V. Vaughan and Amy A. Vaughan v. Federal National Mortgage Association, Movement Mortgage, LLC, Compass California II, Inc., and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
(N.D. California, 2025)
Blair v. Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A.
(D. Arizona, 2024)
Sinco Technologies Pte Ltd. v. Sinco Electronics (Dongguan) Co. Ltd.
(N.D. California, 2021)
Milliken v. Bank of America N.A.
(N.D. California, 2024)
Navarro v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
(D. Arizona, 2020)
Amazon.com, Inc. v. Does
(W.D. Washington, 2019)
Source Credit
History
(Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, §28, formerly §26, 38 Stat. 740; renumbered §27, Pub. L. 96–493, §2, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2568; renumbered §28, Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title IV, §14102(d), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1922.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
This Act, referred to in text, is act Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, 38 Stat. 730, known as the Clayton Act, which is classified generally to sections 12, 13, 14 to 19, 21, and 22 to 27 of this title, and sections 52 and 53 of Title 29, Labor. For further details and complete classification of this Act to the Code, see References in Text note set out under section 12 of this title and Tables.
References in Text
This Act, referred to in text, is act Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, 38 Stat. 730, known as the Clayton Act, which is classified generally to sections 12, 13, 14 to 19, 21, and 22 to 27 of this title, and sections 52 and 53 of Title 29, Labor. For further details and complete classification of this Act to the Code, see References in Text note set out under section 12 of this title and Tables.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 U.S.C. § 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/15/27.