FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter 1
Bringing in additional parties
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Whenever it shall appear to the court before which any proceeding under section 9 of this title may be pending, that the ends of justice require that other parties should be brought before the court, the court may cause them to be summoned, whether they reside in the district in which the court is held or not; and subpoenas to that end may be served in any district by the marshal thereof.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
15 U.S.C. § 10 (Bringing in additional parties) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mordechai Gurary v. Isaac Winehouse and Isaac Winehouse, Doing Business as Wall & Broad Equities, Nu-Tech Bio-Med, Inc.
235 F.3d 792 (Second Circuit, 2000)
United States v. National City Lines, Inc.
334 U.S. 573 (Supreme Court, 1948)
Rolls-Royce Corp. v. Heros, Inc.
576 F. Supp. 2d 765 (N.D. Texas, 2008)
Berk v. Ascott Investment Corp.
759 F. Supp. 245 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1991)
Great Lakes Chemical Corp. v. Monsanto Co.
96 F. Supp. 2d 376 (D. Delaware, 2000)
Popescu v. Apple Inc.
1 Cal. App. 5th 39 (California Court of Appeal, 2016)
Tricontinental Industries, Ltd. v. Anixter
184 F. Supp. 2d 786 (N.D. Illinois, 2002)
Abrams v. Sequium Asset Solutions LLC
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Next Level Ventures LLC v. Avid Holdings Ltd
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Lamb v. Smith and Wamsley PLLC
(D. Arizona, 2024)
Collins Charo Capital LLC v. Biden
(E.D. California, 2024)
Green Builders LLC v. USA Green Builders Corporation
(W.D. Washington, 2025)
Motul S.A. v. USA Wholesale Lubricant
(N.D. California, 2023)
Pacific Recovery Solutions v. Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2021)
Fleming v. Impax Laboratories Inc.
(N.D. California, 2022)
3M Company v. Ugly Juice, LLC dba Good Use
(N.D. California, 2021)
Brooks v. Tarsadia Hotels
(S.D. California, 2019)
Black v. Irving Materials, Inc.
(N.D. California, 2020)
Smith v. Credit Corp Solutions Inc.
(S.D. California, 2022)
Teed v. Chen
(N.D. California, 2022)
Source Credit
History
(Aug. 27, 1894, ch. 349, §75, 28 Stat. 570.)