FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter 1

Jurisdiction of courts; duty of United States attorneys; procedure

15 U.S.C. § 9
Title15Commerce and Trade
Chapter1 — MONOPOLIES AND COMBINATIONS IN RESTRAINT OF TRADE

This text of 15 U.S.C. § 9 (Jurisdiction of courts; duty of United States attorneys; procedure) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
15 U.S.C. § 9.

Text

The several district courts of the United States are invested with jurisdiction to prevent and restrain violations of section 8 of this title; and it shall be the duty of the several United States attorneys, in their respective districts, under the direction of the Attorney General, to institute proceedings in equity to prevent and restrain such violations. Such proceedings may be by way of petitions setting forth the case and praying that such violations shall be enjoined or otherwise prohibited. When the parties complained of shall have been duly notified of such petition the court shall proceed, as soon as may be, to the hearing and determination of the case; and pending such petition and before final decree, the court may at any time make such temporary restraining order or prohibition

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richard Oldroyd v. Elmira Savings Bank, Fsb
134 F.3d 72 (Second Circuit, 1998)
163 case citations
Laurel Gardens, LLC v. Timothy McKenna
948 F.3d 105 (Third Circuit, 2020)
56 case citations
United States v. Nationwide Trailer Rental System, Inc.
156 F. Supp. 800 (D. Kansas, 1957)
16 case citations
Uneedus v. California Shoppers, Inc.
86 Cal. App. 3d 932 (California Court of Appeal, 1978)
15 case citations
Fry v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company
355 F. Supp. 1151 (N.D. Texas, 1973)
13 case citations
Grace Co. v. Williams
20 F. Supp. 263 (W.D. Missouri, 1937)
9 case citations
Gray Line, Inc. v. Gray Line Sightseeing Companies Associated, Inc.
246 F. Supp. 495 (N.D. California, 1965)
4 case citations
Elfenbein v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.
454 F. Supp. 6 (S.D. New York, 1978)
3 case citations
United States v. Lockhart
33 F.2d 597 (D. Nebraska, 1929)
3 case citations
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American & Effird Mills, Inc.
758 F. Supp. 338 (W.D. North Carolina, 1991)
2 case citations
United States v. Anthony Cuti
(Second Circuit, 2014)
Eades v. Kennedy, PC Law Offices
(Second Circuit, 2015)
Bearden v. Ballad Health
(E.D. Tennessee, 2019)
Vera v. FlexShopper, LLC
(N.D. California, 2022)
Hubbard v. Google LLC
(N.D. California, 2021)

Source Credit

History

(Aug. 27, 1894, ch. 349, §74, 28 Stat. 570; Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §291, 36 Stat. 1167; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §1, 62 Stat. 909.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Codification
Act Mar. 3, 1911, vested jurisdiction in "district" courts, instead of "circuit" courts.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Change of Name
Act June 25, 1948, eff. Sept. 1, 1948, substituted "United States attorneys" for "district attorneys of the United States". See section 541 et seq. of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 U.S.C. § 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/15/9.