FEDERAL · 10 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER VII—POST-TRIAL PROCEDURE AND REVIEW OF MILITARY COMMISSIONS
Review by United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; writ of certiorari to Supreme Court
10 U.S.C. § 950g
Title10 — Armed Forces
ChapterSUBCHAPTER VII—POST-TRIAL PROCEDURE AND REVIEW OF MILITARY COMMISSIONS
This text of 10 U.S.C. § 950g (Review by United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; writ of certiorari to Supreme Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
10 U.S.C. § 950g.
Text
(a)Exclusive Appellate Jurisdiction.—Except as provided in subsection (b), the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit shall have exclusive jurisdiction to determine the validity of a final judgment rendered by a military commission (as approved by the convening authority and, where applicable, as affirmed or set aside as incorrect in law by the United States Court of Military Commission Review) under this chapter.
(b)Exhaustion of Other Appeals.—The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit may not review a final judgment described in subsection (a) until all other appeals under this chapter have been waived or exhausted.
(c)Time for Seeking Review.—A petition for review by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Colu
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Khadr v. United States
529 F.3d 1112 (D.C. Circuit, 2008)
Lebron Ex Rel. Padilla v. Rumsfeld
670 F.3d 540 (Fourth Circuit, 2012)
Boumediene, Lakhdar v. Bush, George
476 F.3d 981 (D.C. Circuit, 2007)
In re Al-Nashiri
791 F.3d 71 (D.C. Circuit, 2016)
In re: Mary E. Spears and Rosa A. Eliades
921 F.3d 224 (D.C. Circuit, 2019)
In Re: Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Al-Nashir
835 F.3d 110 (D.C. Circuit, 2016)
Salim Hamdan v. United States
696 F.3d 1238 (D.C. Circuit, 2012)
In re: Omar Khadr
823 F.3d 92 (D.C. Circuit, 2016)
In re: Ammar Al-Baluchi
952 F.3d 363 (D.C. Circuit, 2020)
In re: Khalid Shaikh Mohammad
866 F.3d 473 (D.C. Circuit, 2017)
In re: Mustafa Al Hawsawi
955 F.3d 152 (D.C. Circuit, 2020)
Omar Khadr v. United States
67 F.4th 413 (D.C. Circuit, 2023)
Khadr v. Obama
724 F. Supp. 2d 61 (District of Columbia, 2010)
Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Al-Nashiri
47 F.4th 820 (D.C. Circuit, 2022)
In re: Nashwan al-Tamir
993 F.3d 906 (D.C. Circuit, 2021)
Ali Hamza Ahmad al Bahlul v. United States
(D.C. Circuit, 2023)
In re: Encep Nurjaman
(D.C. Circuit, 2024)
In re: United States of America
(D.C. Circuit, 2025)
Bin Lep v. Trump
(District of Columbia, 2022)
Al-Baluchi v. Gates
(District of Columbia, 2019)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XVIII, §1802, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2603; amended Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title X, §1034(d), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1573.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Prior Provisions
A prior section 950g, added Pub. L. 109–366, §3(a)(1), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2622, related to review by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the Supreme Court, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 111–84.
Amendments
2011—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 112–81, §1034(d)(1), inserted "as affirmed or set aside as incorrect in law by" after "where applicable,".
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 112–81, §1034(d)(2)(A), substituted "in the Court of Appeals—" for "by the accused in the Court of Appeals not later than 20 days after the date on which—" in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 112–81, §1034(d)(2)(B), inserted "not later than 20 days after the date on which" before "written notice" and substituted "on the parties" for "on the accused or on defense counsel".
Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 112–81, §1034(d)(2)(C), inserted "if" before "the accused submits" and inserted before period at end ", not later than 20 days after the date on which such notice is submitted".
Prior Provisions
A prior section 950g, added Pub. L. 109–366, §3(a)(1), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2622, related to review by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the Supreme Court, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 111–84.
Amendments
2011—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 112–81, §1034(d)(1), inserted "as affirmed or set aside as incorrect in law by" after "where applicable,".
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 112–81, §1034(d)(2)(A), substituted "in the Court of Appeals—" for "by the accused in the Court of Appeals not later than 20 days after the date on which—" in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 112–81, §1034(d)(2)(B), inserted "not later than 20 days after the date on which" before "written notice" and substituted "on the parties" for "on the accused or on defense counsel".
Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 112–81, §1034(d)(2)(C), inserted "if" before "the accused submits" and inserted before period at end ", not later than 20 days after the date on which such notice is submitted".
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 U.S.C. § 950g, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/10/950g.