FEDERAL · 10 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER VII—POST-TRIAL PROCEDURE AND REVIEW OF MILITARY COMMISSIONS

Interlocutory appeals by the United States

10 U.S.C. § 950d
Title10Armed Forces
ChapterSUBCHAPTER VII—POST-TRIAL PROCEDURE AND REVIEW OF MILITARY COMMISSIONS

This text of 10 U.S.C. § 950d (Interlocutory appeals by the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
10 U.S.C. § 950d.

Text

(a)Interlocutory Appeal.—Except as provided in subsection (b), in a trial by military commission under this chapter, the United States may take an interlocutory appeal to the United States Court of Military Commission Review of any order or ruling of the military judge—
(1)that terminates proceedings of the military commission with respect to a charge or specification;
(2)that excludes evidence that is substantial proof of a fact material in the proceeding;
(3)that relates to a matter under subsection (c) or (d) of section 949d of this title; or
(4)that, with respect to classified information—
(A)authorizes the disclosure of such information;
(B)imposes sanctions for nondisclosure of such information; or
(C)refuses a protective order sought by the United States to prevent the discl

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Al-Nashiri
791 F.3d 71 (D.C. Circuit, 2016)
52 case citations
In Re: Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Al-Nashir
835 F.3d 110 (D.C. Circuit, 2016)
21 case citations
In re: Mustafa Al Hawsawi
955 F.3d 152 (D.C. Circuit, 2020)
8 case citations
United States v. Al-Nashiri
62 F. Supp. 3d 1305 (Military Commission Review, 2014)
2 case citations
United States v. Khadr
717 F. Supp. 2d 1203 (Military Commission Review, 2007)
1 case citations
United States v. SMITH
(Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, 2025)
United States v. Al-Nashiri
374 F. Supp. 3d 1190 (Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act, 2018)
United States v. Mohammad
391 F. Supp. 3d 1066 (Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act, 2019)
United States v. Mohammad
280 F. Supp. 3d 1305 (Military Commission Review, 2017)

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XVIII, §1802, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2601.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Prior Provisions
A prior section 950d, added Pub. L. 109–366, §3(a)(1), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2620, related to appeal by the United States, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 111–84.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 U.S.C. § 950d, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/10/950d.