FEDERAL · 10 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER IX—POST-TRIAL PROCEDURE AND REVIEW OF COURTS-MARTIAL
Art. 75. Restoration
10 U.S.C. § 875
Title10 — Armed Forces
ChapterSUBCHAPTER IX—POST-TRIAL PROCEDURE AND REVIEW OF COURTS-MARTIAL
This text of 10 U.S.C. § 875 (Art. 75. Restoration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
10 U.S.C. § 875.
Text
(a)Under such regulations as the President may prescribe, all rights, privileges, and property affected by an executed part of a court-martial sentence which has been set aside or disapproved, except an executed dismissal or discharge, shall be restored unless a new trial or rehearing is ordered and such executed part is included in a sentence imposed upon the new trial or rehearing.
(b)If a previously executed sentence of dishonorable or bad-conduct discharge is not imposed on a new trial, the Secretary concerned shall substitute therefor a form of discharge authorized for administrative issuance unless the accused is to serve out the remainder of his enlistment.
(c)If a previously executed sentence of dismissal is not imposed on a new trial, the Secretary concerned shall substitute th
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Howell
75 M.J. 386 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2016)
Todd A. Dock, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United States
46 F.3d 1083 (Federal Circuit, 1995)
Sheridon H. Groves v. United States
47 F.3d 1140 (Federal Circuit, 1995)
Carlisle v. United States
66 Fed. Cl. 627 (Federal Claims, 2005)
Keys v. Cole
31 M.J. 228 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1990)
Sharpe v. United States
935 F.3d 1352 (Federal Circuit, 2019)
United States v. Rasheed
802 F. Supp. 312 (D. Hawaii, 1992)
Anderson v. United States
54 Fed. Cl. 620 (Federal Claims, 2002)
Brown v. United States
42 Fed. Cl. 139 (Federal Claims, 1998)
Golding v. United States
48 Fed. Cl. 697 (Federal Claims, 2001)
United States v. Rokey
62 M.J. 516 (Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, 2005)
United States v. Dodge
60 M.J. 873 (Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, 2005)
United States v. Hammond
61 M.J. 676 (Army Court of Criminal Appeals, 2005)
Dock v. United States
27 Fed. Cl. 62 (Federal Claims, 1992)
Lewis v. United States
99 Fed. Cl. 772 (Federal Claims, 2011)
United States v. Sierra
62 M.J. 539 (Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, 2005)
Jimmy N. Armstrong v. United States
121 F.3d 667 (Federal Circuit, 1997)
Dukes v. Smith
34 M.J. 803 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1991)
Johnson v. United States
41 Fed. Cl. 190 (Federal Claims, 1998)
Liggan v. United States
52 Fed. Cl. 395 (Federal Claims, 2002)
Source Credit
History
(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 63; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LIX, §5337, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2937.)
Editorial Notes
In subsections (b) and (c), the word "If" is substituted for the word "Where". The word "imposed" is substituted for the word "sustained". The words "Secretary concerned" are substituted for the words "Secretary of the Department".
In subsection (c), the word "issue" is substituted for the word "issuance". The word "commissioned" is inserted for clarity. The words "grade and with such rank" are substituted for the words "rank and precedence", since a person is appointed to a grade, not a position of precedence, and the word "rank" is the accepted military word denoting the general idea of precedence. The words "the existence of a" are substituted for the word "position". The word "receive" is omitted as surplusage.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2016—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 114–328 added subsec. (d).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2016 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
Executive Documents
Delegation of Functions
For delegation to Secretary of Homeland Security of certain authority vested in President by this section, see section 2(b) of Ex. Ord. No. 10637, Sept. 16, 1955, 20 F.R. 7025, as amended, set out as a note under section 301 of Title 3, The President.
In subsection (c), the word "issue" is substituted for the word "issuance". The word "commissioned" is inserted for clarity. The words "grade and with such rank" are substituted for the words "rank and precedence", since a person is appointed to a grade, not a position of precedence, and the word "rank" is the accepted military word denoting the general idea of precedence. The words "the existence of a" are substituted for the word "position". The word "receive" is omitted as surplusage.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2016—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 114–328 added subsec. (d).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2016 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
Executive Documents
Delegation of Functions
For delegation to Secretary of Homeland Security of certain authority vested in President by this section, see section 2(b) of Ex. Ord. No. 10637, Sept. 16, 1955, 20 F.R. 7025, as amended, set out as a note under section 301 of Title 3, The President.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 U.S.C. § 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/10/875.