FEDERAL · 10 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER IV—COURT-MARTIAL JURISDICTION
Art. 20. Jurisdiction of summary courts-martial
10 U.S.C. § 820
Title10 — Armed Forces
ChapterSUBCHAPTER IV—COURT-MARTIAL JURISDICTION
This text of 10 U.S.C. § 820 (Art. 20. Jurisdiction of summary courts-martial) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
10 U.S.C. § 820.
Text
(a)In General.—Subject to section 817 of this title (article 17), summary courts-martial have jurisdiction to try persons subject to this chapter, except officers, cadets, aviation cadets, and midshipmen, for any noncapital offense made punishable by this chapter. No person with respect to whom summary courts-martial have jurisdiction may be brought to trial before a summary court-martial if he objects thereto. If objection to trial by summary court-martial is made by an accused, trial may be ordered by special or general court-martial as may be appropriate. Summary courts-martial may, under such limitations as the President may prescribe, adjudge any punishment not forbidden by this chapter except death, dismissal, dishonorable or bad-conduct discharge, confinement for more than one mont
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Middendorf v. Henry
425 U.S. 25 (Supreme Court, 1976)
United States v. Mack
9 M.J. 300 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1980)
United States v. Matthews
16 M.J. 354 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1983)
Dumas v. United States
620 F.2d 247 (Court of Claims, 1980)
United States v. Booker
5 M.J. 246 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1978)
United States v. Kelly
45 M.J. 259 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1996)
John A. Fairchild v. John F. Lehman, Jr., Secretary of the Navy
814 F.2d 1555 (Federal Circuit, 1987)
United States v. Crawford
12 C.M.A. 203 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1961)
United States v. Spivey
10 M.J. 7 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1980)
State v. Ivie
961 P.2d 941 (Washington Supreme Court, 1998)
Daigle v. Warner
490 F.2d 358 (Ninth Circuit, 1973)
United States v. Harrell
5 M.J. 598 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1978)
United States v. Rivera
6 M.J. 535 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1978)
Betonie v. Sizemore
496 F.2d 1001 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)
Bolton v. Dep't of the Navy Bd. for Corr. of Naval Records
914 F.3d 401 (Sixth Circuit, 2019)
Daigle v. Warner
348 F. Supp. 1074 (D. Hawaii, 1972)
United States v. Lecolst
4 M.J. 800 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1978)
Gurson Gourzong v. Attorney General United States
826 F.3d 132 (Third Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Briscoe
13 C.M.A. 510 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1963)
Henry v. Warner
357 F. Supp. 495 (C.D. California, 1973)
Source Credit
History
(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 43; Pub. L. 90–632, §2(6), Oct. 24, 1968, 82 Stat. 1336; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LIV, §5164, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2899.)
Editorial Notes
The word "shall" in the first sentence is omitted as surplusage. The word "may" is substituted for the word "shall" in the second sentence. The words "the provisions of" are omitted as surplusage. The word "If" is substituted for the word "Where". The words "for more than" are substituted for the words "in excess of". The words "more than" are substituted for the words "pay in excess of".
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2016—Pub. L. 114–328 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).
1968—Pub. L. 90–632 substituted provisions prohibiting trial by summary court-martial in all cases if the person objects thereto for provisions allowing such trial over the person's objection if he has previously been offered and has refused article 15 punishment.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2016 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
Effective Date of 1968 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 90–632 effective first day of tenth month following October 1968, see section 4 of Pub. L. 90–632, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2016—Pub. L. 114–328 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).
1968—Pub. L. 90–632 substituted provisions prohibiting trial by summary court-martial in all cases if the person objects thereto for provisions allowing such trial over the person's objection if he has previously been offered and has refused article 15 punishment.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2016 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.
Effective Date of 1968 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 90–632 effective first day of tenth month following October 1968, see section 4 of Pub. L. 90–632, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 U.S.C. § 820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/10/820.