FEDERAL · 10 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER IV—COURT-MARTIAL JURISDICTION

Art. 20. Jurisdiction of summary courts-martial

10 U.S.C. § 820
Title10Armed Forces
ChapterSUBCHAPTER IV—COURT-MARTIAL JURISDICTION

This text of 10 U.S.C. § 820 (Art. 20. Jurisdiction of summary courts-martial) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
10 U.S.C. § 820.

Text

(a)In General.—Subject to section 817 of this title (article 17), summary courts-martial have jurisdiction to try persons subject to this chapter, except officers, cadets, aviation cadets, and midshipmen, for any noncapital offense made punishable by this chapter. No person with respect to whom summary courts-martial have jurisdiction may be brought to trial before a summary court-martial if he objects thereto. If objection to trial by summary court-martial is made by an accused, trial may be ordered by special or general court-martial as may be appropriate. Summary courts-martial may, under such limitations as the President may prescribe, adjudge any punishment not forbidden by this chapter except death, dismissal, dishonorable or bad-conduct discharge, confinement for more than one mont

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Middendorf v. Henry
425 U.S. 25 (Supreme Court, 1976)
332 case citations
United States v. Mack
9 M.J. 300 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1980)
96 case citations
United States v. Matthews
16 M.J. 354 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1983)
75 case citations
Dumas v. United States
620 F.2d 247 (Court of Claims, 1980)
31 case citations
United States v. Booker
5 M.J. 246 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1978)
30 case citations
United States v. Kelly
45 M.J. 259 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1996)
30 case citations
John A. Fairchild v. John F. Lehman, Jr., Secretary of the Navy
814 F.2d 1555 (Federal Circuit, 1987)
25 case citations
United States v. Crawford
12 C.M.A. 203 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1961)
18 case citations
United States v. Spivey
10 M.J. 7 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1980)
16 case citations
State v. Ivie
961 P.2d 941 (Washington Supreme Court, 1998)
14 case citations
Daigle v. Warner
490 F.2d 358 (Ninth Circuit, 1973)
14 case citations
United States v. Harrell
5 M.J. 598 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1978)
14 case citations
United States v. Rivera
6 M.J. 535 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1978)
14 case citations
Betonie v. Sizemore
496 F.2d 1001 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)
12 case citations
Bolton v. Dep't of the Navy Bd. for Corr. of Naval Records
914 F.3d 401 (Sixth Circuit, 2019)
12 case citations
Daigle v. Warner
348 F. Supp. 1074 (D. Hawaii, 1972)
11 case citations
United States v. Lecolst
4 M.J. 800 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1978)
9 case citations
Gurson Gourzong v. Attorney General United States
826 F.3d 132 (Third Circuit, 2016)
9 case citations
United States v. Briscoe
13 C.M.A. 510 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1963)
8 case citations
Henry v. Warner
357 F. Supp. 495 (C.D. California, 1973)
8 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 43; Pub. L. 90–632, §2(6), Oct. 24, 1968, 82 Stat. 1336; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LIV, §5164, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2899.)

Editorial Notes

The word "shall" in the first sentence is omitted as surplusage. The word "may" is substituted for the word "shall" in the second sentence. The words "the provisions of" are omitted as surplusage. The word "If" is substituted for the word "Where". The words "for more than" are substituted for the words "in excess of". The words "more than" are substituted for the words "pay in excess of".

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2016—Pub. L. 114–328 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).
1968—Pub. L. 90–632 substituted provisions prohibiting trial by summary court-martial in all cases if the person objects thereto for provisions allowing such trial over the person's objection if he has previously been offered and has refused article 15 punishment.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2016 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.

Effective Date of 1968 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 90–632 effective first day of tenth month following October 1968, see section 4 of Pub. L. 90–632, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 U.S.C. § 820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/10/820.