FEDERAL · 10 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER IV—COURT-MARTIAL JURISDICTION

Art. 18. Jurisdiction of general courts-martial

10 U.S.C. § 818
Title10Armed Forces
ChapterSUBCHAPTER IV—COURT-MARTIAL JURISDICTION

This text of 10 U.S.C. § 818 (Art. 18. Jurisdiction of general courts-martial) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
10 U.S.C. § 818.

Text

(a)Subject to section 817 of this title (article 17), general courts-martial have jurisdiction to try persons subject to this chapter for any offense made punishable by this chapter and may, under such limitations as the President may prescribe, adjudge any punishment not forbidden by this chapter, including the penalty of death when specifically authorized by this chapter. General courts-martial also have jurisdiction to try any person who by the law of war is subject to trial by a military tribunal and may adjudge any punishment permitted by the law of war.
(b)A general court-martial of the kind specified in section 816(b)(3) of this title (article 16(b)(3)) shall not have jurisdiction to try any person for any offense for which the death penalty may be adjudged unless the case has bee

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Loving
41 M.J. 213 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1994)
365 case citations
Middendorf v. Henry
425 U.S. 25 (Supreme Court, 1976)
332 case citations
United States v. Ali
71 M.J. 256 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2012)
79 case citations
United States v. Matthews
16 M.J. 354 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1983)
75 case citations
United States v. Gaskins
72 M.J. 225 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2013)
61 case citations
United States v. Blaylock
15 M.J. 190 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1983)
61 case citations
United States v. Beaty
70 M.J. 39 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2011)
57 case citations
United States v. Curtis
32 M.J. 252 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1991)
51 case citations
United States v. Culp
14 C.M.A. 199 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1963)
48 case citations
United States v. Simpson
10 C.M.A. 229 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1959)
39 case citations
United States v. Norfleet
53 M.J. 262 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2000)
36 case citations
United States v. Fricke
53 M.J. 149 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2000)
35 case citations
United States v. Varnadore
9 C.M.A. 471 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1958)
33 case citations
Dumas v. United States
620 F.2d 247 (Court of Claims, 1980)
31 case citations
United States v. Kelly
45 M.J. 259 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1996)
30 case citations
United States v. French
10 C.M.A. 171 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1959)
27 case citations
John A. Fairchild v. John F. Lehman, Jr., Secretary of the Navy
814 F.2d 1555 (Federal Circuit, 1987)
25 case citations
United States v. Nealy
71 M.J. 73 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2012)
23 case citations
United States v. Straight
42 M.J. 244 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1995)
23 case citations
United States v. Clark
35 M.J. 432 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1992)
22 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 43; Pub. L. 90–632, §2(4), Oct. 24, 1968, 82 Stat. 1335; Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title XVII, §1705(b), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 959; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LIV, §5162, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2898.)

Editorial Notes

The word "shall" is omitted as surplusage wherever it occurs.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2016—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 114–328, §5162(1), substituted "section 816(b)(3) of this title (article 16(b)(3))" for "section 816(1)(B) of this title (article 16(1)(B))".
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 114–328, §5162(2), added subsec. (c) and struck out former subsec. (c) which read as follows: "Consistent with sections 819, 820, and 856(b) of this title (articles 19, 20, and 56(b)), only general courts-martial have jurisdiction over an offense specified in section 856(b)(2) of this title (article 56(b)(2))."
2013—Pub. L. 113–66 designated the first two sentences as subsec. (a), designated third sentence as subsec. (b) and substituted "A general court-martial" for "However, a general court-martial", and added subsec. (c).
1968—Pub. L. 90–632 provided that a general court-martial consisting of only a military judge has no jurisdiction in cases in which the death penalty may be adjudged unless the case has been previously referred to trial as a noncapital case.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2016 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.

Effective Date of 2013 Amendment
Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title XVII, §1705(c), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 960, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [amending this section and section 856 of this title] shall take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 26, 2013], and apply to offenses specified in section 856(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code (article 56(b)(2) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by subsection (a)(1), committed on or after that date."

Effective Date of 1968 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 90–632 effective first day of tenth month following October 1968, see section 4 of Pub. L. 90–632, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 U.S.C. § 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/10/818.