FEDERAL · 10 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

Art. 6. Judge advocates and legal officers

10 U.S.C. § 806
Title10Armed Forces
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

This text of 10 U.S.C. § 806 (Art. 6. Judge advocates and legal officers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
10 U.S.C. § 806.

Text

(a)(1) A member of the armed forces may only serve as a judge advocate if such member—
(A)is admitted to the practice of law before the highest court of a State, territory, commonwealth, or the District of Columbia;
(B)maintains a license status that provides current eligibility to actively practice law before such court;
(C)is subject to the disciplinary review process of the jurisdiction in which such member maintains such a license status; and
(D)is in compliance with any other requirements of such jurisdiction to remain eligible to practice law in such jurisdiction.
(2)The Judge Advocates General of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard and the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps may suspend the authority of a judge advocate of the Army, Navy, Air Force

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Kossman
38 M.J. 258 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1993)
115 case citations
United States v. Graf
35 M.J. 450 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1992)
108 case citations
United States v. Cruz
25 M.J. 326 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1987)
81 case citations
United States v. Finster
51 M.J. 185 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1999)
68 case citations
United States v. Ledbetter
2 M.J. 37 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1976)
66 case citations
United States v. Albright
9 C.M.A. 628 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1958)
62 case citations
United States v. Rivers
49 M.J. 434 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1998)
52 case citations
United States v. Redding
11 M.J. 100 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1981)
46 case citations
United States v. Key
57 M.J. 246 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2002)
46 case citations
United States v. Engle
1 M.J. 387 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1976)
43 case citations
United States v. Hagen
25 M.J. 78 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1987)
40 case citations
United States v. Lynch
13 M.J. 394 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1982)
39 case citations
United States v. Danylo
73 M.J. 183 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2014)
30 case citations
United States v. Bennett
12 M.J. 463 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1982)
29 case citations
United States v. Argo
46 M.J. 454 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1997)
27 case citations
United States v. Edwards
45 M.J. 114 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1996)
22 case citations
United States v. Brown
13 M.J. 253 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1982)
22 case citations
United States v. Burroughs
12 M.J. 380 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1982)
22 case citations
United States v. Stefan
69 M.J. 256 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2010)
21 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 39; Pub. L. 90–179, §1(3), Dec. 8, 1967, 81 Stat. 545; Pub. L. 90–632, §2(2), Oct. 24, 1968, 82 Stat. 1335; Pub. L. 98–209, §2(b), Dec. 6, 1983, 97 Stat. 1393; Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title VIII, §807(a), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3909; Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, §1704(b)(1), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2314; Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title V, §531(d)(1), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1726; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LI, §5103, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2895; Pub. L. 119–60, div. A, title V, §§561(a), 562, Dec. 18, 2025, 139 Stat. 881, 882.)

Editorial Notes

In subsection (b), the word "entitled" is substituted for the word "authorized".
In subsection (c), the words "may later" are substituted for the words "shall subsequently".

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2025—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 119–60, §561(a), added subsec. (a). Former subsec. (a) redesignated (b).
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 119–60, §562, designated existing provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).
Pub. L. 119–60, §561(a), redesignated subsec. (a) as (b). Former subsec. (b) redesignated (c).
Subsecs. (c) to (e). Pub. L. 119–60, §561(a), redesignated subsecs. (b) to (d) as (c) to (e), respectively.
2016—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 114–328 amended subsec. (c) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (c) read as follows: "No person who has acted as member, military judge, trial counsel, assistant trial counsel, defense counsel, assistant defense counsel, or investigating officer in any case may later act as a staff judge advocate or legal officer to any reviewing authority upon the same case."
2013—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 112–239 substituted "The Judge Advocates General, and within the Marine Corps the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps, or senior members of their staffs, shall" for "The Judge Advocate General or senior members of his staff shall".
2002—Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 107–296 substituted "of Homeland Security" for "of Transportation".
1986—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 99–661 added subsec. (d).
1983—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–209 substituted "Air Force, and" for "and Air Force and law specialists of the".
1968—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 90–632 substituted "military judge" for "law officer".
1967—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 90–179 substituted reference to judge advocates of the Navy for reference to law specialists of the Navy and provided for the assignment of judge advocates of the Marine Corps.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2016 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.

Effective Date of 2002 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296 effective on the date of transfer of the Coast Guard to the Department of Homeland Security, see section 1704(g) of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

Effective Date of 1986 Amendment
Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title VIII, §807(b), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3909, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section]—
"(1) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 14, 1986]; and
"(2) may not be construed to invalidate an action taken by a judge advocate, pursuant to an assignment or detail under section 973(b)(2)(B) of title 10, United States Code, before the date of the enactment of this Act."

Effective Date of 1983 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–209 effective first day of eighth calendar month beginning after Dec. 6, 1983, see section 12(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–209, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.

Effective Date of 1968 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 90–632 effective first day of tenth month following October 1968, see section 4 of Pub. L. 90–632, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 U.S.C. § 806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/10/806.