Washington Statutes

§ 34.05.452 — Rules of evidence—Cross-examination.

Washington § 34.05.452
JurisdictionWashington
Title 34ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Ch. 34.05ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT

This text of Washington § 34.05.452 (Rules of evidence—Cross-examination.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wash. Rev. Code § 34.05.452 (2026).

Text

(1)Evidence, including hearsay evidence, is admissible if in the judgment of the presiding officer it is the kind of evidence on which reasonably prudent persons are accustomed to rely in the conduct of their affairs. The presiding officer shall exclude evidence that is excludable on constitutional or statutory grounds or on the basis of evidentiary privilege recognized in the courts of this state. The presiding officer may exclude evidence that is irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious.
(2)If not inconsistent with subsection (1) of this section, the presiding officer shall refer to the Washington Rules of Evidence as guidelines for evidentiary rulings.
(3)All testimony of parties and witnesses shall be made under oath or affirmation.
(4)Documentary evidence may be received i

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings Board
90 P.3d 659 (Washington Supreme Court, 2004)
216 case citations
Seattle Building & Construction Trades Council v. Apprenticeship & Training Council
920 P.2d 581 (Washington Supreme Court, 1996)
65 case citations
Weyerhaeuser v. Pierce County
873 P.2d 498 (Washington Supreme Court, 1994)
64 case citations
Goldsmith v. Department of Social & Health Services
280 P.3d 1173 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2012)
20 case citations
Ingram v. Department of Licensing
162 Wash. 2d 514 (Washington Supreme Court, 2007)
15 case citations
Yow v. Department of Health Unlicensed Practice Program
199 P.3d 417 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2008)
11 case citations
In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Sanai
177 Wash. 2d 743 (Washington Supreme Court, 2013)
9 case citations
Lawrence v. Department of Health
138 P.3d 124 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2006)
9 case citations
Dodge City Saloon, Inc. v. Washington State Liquor Control Board
288 P.3d 343 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2012)
8 case citations
Seymour v. Department of Health, Dental Quality Assurance Commission
152 Wash. App. 156 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2009)
6 case citations
Seymour v. STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH, DQAC
216 P.3d 1039 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2009)
6 case citations
Porter Law Center, LLC v. Department of Financial Institutions
385 P.3d 146 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2016)
5 case citations
Brandon H. Ex Rel. Richard H. v. Kennewick School District No. 17
82 F. Supp. 2d 1174 (E.D. Washington, 2000)
3 case citations
Abdullatif Arishi v. Washington State University
385 P.3d 251 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2016)
3 case citations
Port of Seattle v. PCHB
90 P.3d 659 (Washington Supreme Court, 2004)
1 case citations
WASHINGTON STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH v. Yow
199 P.3d 417 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2008)
1 case citations
Dodge City Saloon v. State Liquor Control
271 P.3d 363 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2012)
1 case citations
Blake Huegel, V. D.s.h.s., State Of Wa
(Court of Appeals of Washington, 2024)
Swanson Hay Company v. Employment Security Department
(Court of Appeals of Washington, 2017)
Seattle Bldg. Council v. Appren. Council
920 P.2d 581 (Washington Supreme Court, 1996)

Legislative History

[1988 c 288 s 415;1959 c 234 s 10. Formerly RCW34.04.100.]

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Washington § 34.05.452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/wa/34.05.452.