Washington Statutes
§ 34.05.452 — Rules of evidence—Cross-examination.
Washington § 34.05.452
This text of Washington § 34.05.452 (Rules of evidence—Cross-examination.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wash. Rev. Code § 34.05.452 (2026).
Text
(1)Evidence, including hearsay evidence, is admissible if in the judgment of the presiding officer it is the kind of evidence on which reasonably prudent persons are accustomed to rely in the conduct of their affairs. The presiding officer shall exclude evidence that is excludable on constitutional or statutory grounds or on the basis of evidentiary privilege recognized in the courts of this state. The presiding officer may exclude evidence that is irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious.
(2)If not inconsistent with subsection (1) of this section, the presiding officer shall refer to the Washington Rules of Evidence as guidelines for evidentiary rulings.
(3)All testimony of parties and witnesses shall be made under oath or affirmation.
(4)Documentary evidence may be received i
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings Board
90 P.3d 659 (Washington Supreme Court, 2004)
Seattle Building & Construction Trades Council v. Apprenticeship & Training Council
920 P.2d 581 (Washington Supreme Court, 1996)
Weyerhaeuser v. Pierce County
873 P.2d 498 (Washington Supreme Court, 1994)
Goldsmith v. Department of Social & Health Services
280 P.3d 1173 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2012)
Ingram v. Department of Licensing
162 Wash. 2d 514 (Washington Supreme Court, 2007)
Yow v. Department of Health Unlicensed Practice Program
199 P.3d 417 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2008)
In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Sanai
177 Wash. 2d 743 (Washington Supreme Court, 2013)
Lawrence v. Department of Health
138 P.3d 124 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2006)
Dodge City Saloon, Inc. v. Washington State Liquor Control Board
288 P.3d 343 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2012)
Seymour v. Department of Health, Dental Quality Assurance Commission
152 Wash. App. 156 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2009)
Seymour v. STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH, DQAC
216 P.3d 1039 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2009)
Porter Law Center, LLC v. Department of Financial Institutions
385 P.3d 146 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2016)
Brandon H. Ex Rel. Richard H. v. Kennewick School District No. 17
82 F. Supp. 2d 1174 (E.D. Washington, 2000)
Abdullatif Arishi v. Washington State University
385 P.3d 251 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2016)
Port of Seattle v. PCHB
90 P.3d 659 (Washington Supreme Court, 2004)
WASHINGTON STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH v. Yow
199 P.3d 417 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2008)
Dodge City Saloon v. State Liquor Control
271 P.3d 363 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2012)
Blake Huegel, V. D.s.h.s., State Of Wa
(Court of Appeals of Washington, 2024)
Swanson Hay Company v. Employment Security Department
(Court of Appeals of Washington, 2017)
Seattle Bldg. Council v. Appren. Council
920 P.2d 581 (Washington Supreme Court, 1996)
Legislative History
[1988 c 288 s 415;1959 c 234 s 10. Formerly RCW34.04.100.]
Nearby Sections
15
§ 34.05.001
Legislative intent.§ 34.05.010
Definitions.§ 34.05.050
Waiver.§ 34.05.060
Informal settlements.§ 34.05.070
Conversion of proceedings.§ 34.05.080
Variation from time limits.§ 34.05.090
Forest practices board—Emergency rules.§ 34.05.100
Respectful language.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Washington § 34.05.452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/wa/34.05.452.