Utah § 78A-2-226 Repeated application for orders forbidden -- Disobedience -- Contempt.

Utah Statutes

§ 78A-2-226 — Repeated application for orders forbidden -- Disobedience -- Contempt.

Utah § 78A-2-226

Title 78AJudiciary and Judicial Administration

Ch. 78A-2Judicial Administration

Part 78A-2-2General Provisions Applicable to Courts and Judges

This text of Utah § 78A-2-226 (Repeated application for orders forbidden -- Disobedience -- Contempt.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Utah Code Ann. § 78A-2-226 (2026).

Text

(1)If an application for an order, made to a judge of a court in which the action or proceeding is pending, is refused in whole or in part or is granted conditionally, a subsequent application for the same order may not be made to any other judge, except of a higher court.

(2)This section does not apply to motions refused for any informality in the papers or proceedings necessary to obtain the order, or to motions refused with liberty to renew them.

(3)A notice of appeal for a trial de novo is not a subsequent application for the same order.

(4)A violation of Subsection (1) may be punished by contempt and any subsequent order may be revoked by the issuing judge or vacated by a judge of the court in which the action or proceeding is pending.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(1) If an application for an order, made to a judge of a court in which the action or proceeding is pending, is refused in whole or in part or is granted conditionally, a subsequent application for the same order may not be made to any other judge, except of a higher court.
(2) This section does not apply to motions refused for any informality in the papers or proceedings necessary to obtain the order, or to motions refused with liberty to renew them.
(3) A notice of appeal for a trial de novo is not a subsequent application for the same order.
(4) A violation of Subsection (1) may be punished by contempt and any subsequent order may be revoked by the issuing judge or vacated by a judge of the court in which the action or proceeding is pending.