Tennessee Statutes
§ 47-2-209 — Modification, rescission and waiver
Tennessee·Title 47
(1)An agreement modifying a contract within this chapter needs no consideration to be binding.
(2)A signed agreement which excludes modification or rescission except by a signed writing cannot be otherwise modified or rescinded, but except as between merchants such a requirement on a form supplied by the merchant must be separately signed by the other party.
(3)The requirements of the statute of frauds section of this chapter (§ 47-2-201 ) must be satisfied if the contract as modified is within its provisions.
(4)Although an attempt at modification or rescission does not satisfy the requirements of subsection (2) or (3) it can operate as a waiver.
(5)A party who has made a waiver affecting an executory portion of the contract may retract the waiver by reasonable notification received
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tennessee § 47-2-209 (Modification, rescission and waiver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
GuestHouse International, LLC v. Shoney's North America Corp.
330 S.W.3d 166 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2010)
Stovall of Chattanooga, Inc. v. Cunningham
890 S.W.2d 442 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1994)
Ralston Purina Company v. McNabb
381 F. Supp. 181 (W.D. Tennessee, 1974)
Knoxville Rod & Bearing, Inc. v. Bettis Corp. of Knoxville
672 S.W.2d 203 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1983)
Waldschmidt v. Chrysler Credit Corp. (In Re Messenger)
166 B.R. 631 (M.D. Tennessee, 1994)
Upperline Equipment Co. v. J & M, Inc.
724 F. Supp. 2d 883 (E.D. Tennessee, 2009)
Walker v. Associates Commercial Corp.
673 S.W.2d 517 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1983)
Paskell v. Nobility Homes, Inc.
871 S.W.2d 481 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1994)
US FOR USE AND BENEFIT OF SHANKLE-CLAIRDAY v. Crow
414 F. Supp. 160 (M.D. Tennessee, 1976)
W. Silver Recycling, Inc. v. Protrade Steel Company, LTD.
(M.D. Tennessee, 2019)
Duffy Tool & Stamping, Inc. v. Bosch Automotive Motor Systems, formerly known as BG Automotive Motors, Inc.
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2000)
Super Grip Corporation v. B & D Super Grip, Inc., - Concurring
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1997)
Legislative History
Acts 1963, ch. 81, § 1 (2-209).
Nearby Sections
15
§ 47-1-101
Short title§ 47-1-102
Scope of chapter§ 47-1-104
Construction against implied repeal§ 47-1-105
Severability§ 47-1-106
Use of singular and plural - Gender§ 47-1-201
General definitions§ 47-1-202
Notice - Knowledge§ 47-1-204
Value§ 47-1-205
Reasonable time - Seasonableness§ 47-1-206
Presumptions§ 47-1-302
Variation by agreement