Tennessee Statutes
§ 36-6-202 — Construction and purpose
Tennessee § 36-6-202
JurisdictionTennessee
Title36
This text of Tennessee § 36-6-202 (Construction and purpose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-202 (2026).
Text
This part shall be liberally construed and applied to promote its underlying purposes and policies. This part should be construed according to its purposes, which are to:
(1)Avoid jurisdictional competition and conflict with courts of other states in matters of child custody which have in the past resulted in the shifting of children from state to state with harmful effects on their well-being;
(2)Promote cooperation with the courts of other states to the end that a custody decree is rendered in that state which can best decide the case in the interest of the child;
(3)Discourage the use of the interstate system for continuing controversies over child custody;
(4)Deter abductions of children;
(5)Avoid relitigation of custody decisions of other states in this state; and (6) Facilitate
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Adoption of Copeland
43 S.W.3d 483 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2000)
Brown v. Brown
847 S.W.2d 496 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1993)
Arnold v. Gouvitsa
735 S.W.2d 458 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1987)
Gaddy v. Gaddy
861 S.W.2d 236 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1992)
Wilson v. Wilson
58 S.W.3d 718 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2001)
Roderick v. Roderick
776 S.W.2d 533 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1989)
Wilcox v. Wilcox
862 S.W.2d 533 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1993)
In Re: Apex R.
577 S.W.3d 181 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2018)
Graham v. Copeland
43 S.W.3d 483 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2000)
Culp v. Culp
917 S.W.2d 233 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1995)
Patrick Richard Moorcroft v. Flora Templeton Stuart v. Natalie Talmage Moorcroft
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2015)
In Re Arabella L.
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2017)
Adedamola Olagoki Oni v. Cassondra Tucker Oni
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2018)
Amber Ada Hernandez v. David Alan Hernandez
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2019)
Roger Chase Hagans v. Rachel Wallock Hagans
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2018)
Griffin (Meyer) v. Griffin
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1998)
Karen D. Conover v. Brian Scott Conover
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2010)
In Re B.N.W.
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2005)
In Re Serenity W. M.
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2015)
Kyle Edward Dangler, Lisa Ann Dangler v. Edward Eugene Dangler, father, Patricia G. Dangler, and Edward C. Dangler, Grandparents
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1996)
Legislative History
Acts 1999, ch. 389, § 3.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 36-1-101
Purpose of part - Construction§ 36-1-102
Part definitions§ 36-1-106
Readoption§ 36-1-107
Persons to whom this part is applicable§ 36-1-114
VenueCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Tennessee § 36-6-202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/tn/36-6-202.