Tennessee Statutes
§ 29-28-105 — Determination of defective or dangerous condition
Tennessee·Title 29
(a)A manufacturer or seller of a product shall not be liable for any injury to a person or property caused by the product unless the product is determined to be in a defective condition or unreasonably dangerous at the time it left the control of the manufacturer or seller.
(b)In making this determination, the state of scientific and technological knowledge available to the manufacturer or seller at the time the product was placed on the market, rather than at the time of injury, is applicable. Consideration is given also to the customary designs, methods, standards and techniques of manufacturing, inspecting and testing by other manufacturers or sellers of similar products.
(c)This section does not apply to an action based on express warranty or misrepresentation regarding the chattel.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tennessee § 29-28-105 (Determination of defective or dangerous condition) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Curtis v. Universal Match Corp.
778 F. Supp. 1421 (E.D. Tennessee, 1991)
Coffey v. Dowley Manufacturing, Inc.
187 F. Supp. 2d 958 (M.D. Tennessee, 2002)
Maness v. Boston Scientific
751 F. Supp. 2d 962 (E.D. Tennessee, 2010)
Harwell v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
803 F. Supp. 1287 (M.D. Tennessee, 1992)
Higgs v. General Motors Corp.
655 F. Supp. 22 (E.D. Tennessee, 1985)
Tatum v. Cordis Corp.
758 F. Supp. 457 (M.D. Tennessee, 1991)
Roysdon v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
623 F. Supp. 1189 (E.D. Tennessee, 1985)
Greene v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
72 F. Supp. 2d 882 (W.D. Tennessee, 1999)
Rollins v. Cherokee Warehouses, Inc.
635 F. Supp. 136 (E.D. Tennessee, 1986)
Martin v. Michelin North America, Inc.
92 F. Supp. 2d 745 (E.D. Tennessee, 2000)
Brown v. Raymond Corp.
318 F. Supp. 2d 591 (W.D. Tennessee, 2004)
Johnson v. Manitowoc Boom Trucks, Inc.
406 F. Supp. 2d 852 (M.D. Tennessee, 2005)
McKinnie v. Lundell Manufacturing Co.
825 F. Supp. 834 (W.D. Tennessee, 1993)
Fleming v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
186 F. Supp. 3d 826 (W.D. Tennessee, 2016)
Moore v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
217 F. Supp. 3d 990 (E.D. Tennessee, 2016)
Davis v. Komatsu America Industries Corp.
46 F. Supp. 2d 745 (W.D. Tennessee, 1999)
Jones v. WFM-Wo, Inc.
265 F. Supp. 3d 775 (M.D. Tennessee, 2017)
Gentry v. HERSHEY CO.
687 F. Supp. 2d 711 (M.D. Tennessee, 2010)
Richardson v. GlaxoSmithKline
412 F. Supp. 2d 863 (W.D. Tennessee, 2006)
Payne v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.
967 F. Supp. 2d 1223 (E.D. Tennessee, 2013)
Legislative History
Acts 1978, ch. 703, §§ 5, 8; T.C.A, § 23-3705.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 29-1-101
Application of equitable remedies§ 29-1-102
Injunction pending litigation§ 29-1-103
Receivers pending litigation§ 29-1-104
Receiver's bond§ 29-1-106
Judges granting extraordinary process§ 29-1-107
Statement as to first application§ 29-1-108
Application after refusal§ 29-1-109
Endorsement of refusal§ 29-1-110
Transmission of bill and fiat to clerk§ 29-1-111
Scope of provisions§ 29-10-101
Chapter definitions§ 29-10-103
Enforcement of chapter