Tennessee Statutes
§ 29-28-103 — Limitation of actions - Exception
Tennessee § 29-28-103
JurisdictionTennessee
Title29
This text of Tennessee § 29-28-103 (Limitation of actions - Exception) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-28-103 (2026).
Text
(a)Any action against a manufacturer or seller of a product for injury to person or property caused by its defective or unreasonably dangerous condition must be brought within the period fixed by §§ 28-3-104 , 28-3-105 , 28-3-202 and 47-2-725 , but notwithstanding any exceptions to these provisions, it must be brought within six (6) years of the date of injury, in any event, the action must be brought within ten (10) years from the date on which the product was first purchased for use or consumption, or within one (1) year after the expiration of the anticipated life of the product, whichever is the shorter, except in the case of injury to minors whose action must be brought within a period of one (1) year after attaining the age of majority, whichever occurs sooner.
(b)The foregoing lim
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
County of Johnson v. United States Gypsum Co.
580 F. Supp. 284 (E.D. Tennessee, 1984)
Gaines v. Excel Industries, Inc.
667 F. Supp. 569 (M.D. Tennessee, 1987)
Electric Power Board v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
716 F. Supp. 1069 (E.D. Tennessee, 1988)
Greene v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
72 F. Supp. 2d 882 (W.D. Tennessee, 1999)
Hawkins Ex Rel. Hawkins v. D & J Press Co.
527 F. Supp. 386 (E.D. Tennessee, 1981)
Fugate v. AAA MacHinery & Equipment Company
593 F. Supp. 392 (E.D. Tennessee, 1984)
Milligan v. American Hoist and Derrick Co.
622 F. Supp. 56 (W.D. Tennessee, 1985)
Montgomery v. Wyeth
540 F. Supp. 2d 933 (E.D. Tennessee, 2008)
Delano v. Abbott Laboratories
908 F. Supp. 2d 888 (W.D. Tennessee, 2012)
Grant v. Kia Motors Corp.
185 F. Supp. 3d 1033 (E.D. Tennessee, 2016)
Lee v. Toshiba MacHine Co. of America
804 F. Supp. 1029 (E.D. Tennessee, 1992)
Charter Oak Fire Insurance v. Broan Nutone, LLC
348 F. Supp. 2d 934 (W.D. Tennessee, 2004)
Langford v. Gatlinburg Real Estate & Rental, Inc.
499 F. Supp. 2d 1042 (E.D. Tennessee, 2007)
Clabo v. Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems, Inc.
(E.D. Tennessee, 2020)
Clarksville-Montgomery County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.
710 F. Supp. 1157 (M.D. Tennessee, 1989)
Frazier v. Breville USA, Inc.
(M.D. Tennessee, 2025)
Harper v. United States
987 F. Supp. 1025 (E.D. Tennessee, 1996)
Mathis v. Eli Lilly and Co.
577 F. Supp. 35 (E.D. Tennessee, 1981)
Legislative History
Acts 1978, ch. 703, § 3; 1979, ch. 162, § 1; T.C.A., §23-3703; Acts 1993, ch. 457, §§ 1, 2.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 29-1-101
Application of equitable remedies§ 29-1-102
Injunction pending litigation§ 29-1-103
Receivers pending litigation§ 29-1-104
Receiver's bond§ 29-1-106
Judges granting extraordinary process§ 29-1-107
Statement as to first application§ 29-1-108
Application after refusal§ 29-1-109
Endorsement of refusal§ 29-1-110
Transmission of bill and fiat to clerk§ 29-1-111
Scope of provisions§ 29-10-101
Chapter definitions§ 29-10-103
Enforcement of chapterCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Tennessee § 29-28-103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/tn/29-28-103.