Tennessee Statutes
§ 29-26-118 — Proving inadequacy of consent
Tennessee § 29-26-118
JurisdictionTennessee
Title29
This text of Tennessee § 29-26-118 (Proving inadequacy of consent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-26-118 (2026).
Text
In a health care liability action, the plaintiff shall prove by evidence as required by § 29-26-115(b) that the defendant did not supply appropriate information to the patient in obtaining informed consent (to the procedure out of which plaintiff's claim allegedly arose) in accordance with the recognized standard of acceptable professional practice in the profession and in the specialty, if any, that the defendant practices in the community in which the defendant practices and in similar communities.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Shadrick v. Coker
963 S.W.2d 726 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1998)
Church v. Perales
39 S.W.3d 149 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2000)
Blanchard v. Kellum
975 S.W.2d 522 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1998)
Cardwell v. Bechtol
724 S.W.2d 739 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1987)
Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. Sundquist
38 S.W.3d 1 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2000)
Ike J. WHITE III v. David A. BEEKS, M.D
469 S.W.3d 517 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2015)
Bryant v. HCA Health Services of No. Tennessee, Inc.
15 S.W.3d 804 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2000)
Ashe v. Radiation Oncology Associates
9 S.W.3d 119 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1999)
Housh v. Morris
818 S.W.2d 39 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1991)
MILLER EX REL. MILLER v. Dacus
231 S.W.3d 903 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2007)
Mitchell v. Kayem
54 S.W.3d 775 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2001)
Planned Parenthood of Tennessee and North Mississippi v. Slatery
(M.D. Tennessee, 2020)
West v. United States
(M.D. Tennessee, 2020)
Ike J. White, III v. David A. Beeks, M.D. - Dissenting
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2013)
Ike J. White, III v. David A. Beeks, M.D.
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2013)
Shemeka Metin Ibrahim v. Murfreesboro Medical Clinic Surgi Center
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2014)
Amber Hobbs v. Seton Corporation d/b/a Baptist Hospital
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2009)
Teresa Grimes Kidd v. James Q. Dickerson
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2020)
Donna Cooper v. Dr. Mason Wesley Mandy
(Tennessee Supreme Court, 2022)
Lacey A. Maine v. Wellmont Health System D/B/A Bristol
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2000)
Legislative History
Acts 1975, ch. 299, § 17; 1976, ch. 759, § 18; T.C.A., § 23-3417; Acts 2012 , ch. 798, § 10.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 29-1-101
Application of equitable remedies§ 29-1-102
Injunction pending litigation§ 29-1-103
Receivers pending litigation§ 29-1-104
Receiver's bond§ 29-1-106
Judges granting extraordinary process§ 29-1-107
Statement as to first application§ 29-1-108
Application after refusal§ 29-1-109
Endorsement of refusal§ 29-1-110
Transmission of bill and fiat to clerk§ 29-1-111
Scope of provisions§ 29-10-101
Chapter definitions§ 29-10-103
Enforcement of chapterCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Tennessee § 29-26-118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/tn/29-26-118.