Tennessee Statutes
§ 29-11-102 — Right of contribution among tort-feasors - Exceptions - Subrogation - Indemnity
Tennessee § 29-11-102
JurisdictionTennessee
Title29
This text of Tennessee § 29-11-102 (Right of contribution among tort-feasors - Exceptions - Subrogation - Indemnity) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-11-102 (2026).
Text
(a)Except as otherwise provided in this chapter where two (2) or more persons are jointly or severally liable in tort for the same injury to person or property or for the same wrongful death, there is a right of contribution among them even though judgment has not been recovered against all or any of them; but no right of contribution shall exist where, by virtue of intrafamily immunity, immunity under the workers' compensation laws of the state of Tennessee, or like immunity, a claimant is barred from maintaining a tort action for injury or wrongful death against the party from whom contribution is sought.
(b)The right of contribution exists only in favor of a tort-feasor who has paid more than the proportionate share of the shared liability between two (2) or more tort-feasors for the
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Limbaugh v. Coffee Medical Center
59 S.W.3d 73 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2001)
Ridings v. Ralph M. Parsons Co.
914 S.W.2d 79 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1996)
Messer Griesheim Industries, Inc. v. Cryotech of Kingsport, Inc.
45 S.W.3d 588 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2001)
Bervoets v. Harde Ralls Pontiac-Olds, Inc.
891 S.W.2d 905 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1995)
Knox-Tenn Rental Co. v. Jenkins Insurance, Inc.
755 S.W.2d 33 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1988)
Olin Corporation v. Yeargin Incorporated
146 F.3d 398 (Sixth Circuit, 1998)
Bass v. Janney Montgomery Scott, Inc.
210 F.3d 577 (Sixth Circuit, 2000)
Autozone, Inc. v. Glidden Co.
737 F. Supp. 2d 936 (W.D. Tennessee, 2010)
Manning v. Fort Deposit Bank
619 F. Supp. 1327 (W.D. Tennessee, 1985)
Smith v. Methodist Hospitals of Memphis
995 S.W.2d 584 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1999)
Wolff & Munier, Inc. v. Price-Waterhouse
811 S.W.2d 532 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1991)
Duncan-Williams, Inc. v. Capstone Development, LLC
908 F. Supp. 2d 898 (W.D. Tennessee, 2012)
Nissan North America, Inc. v. Continental Automotive Systems, Inc.
(M.D. Tennessee, 2019)
Wade v. Newport Group, Inc.
(W.D. Tennessee, 2024)
Zurich American Insurance Company v. Scott, Murphy & Daniel, LLC
(E.D. Tennessee, 2024)
Melanie Jones, individually and on behalf of Matthew H. v. Shavonna Rachelle Windham
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2016)
Engstrom v. Mayfield
159 F. App'x 697 (Sixth Circuit, 2005)
James and Patricia Cullum v. Baptist Hospital Systems, Inc.
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2011)
Katherine Jewell Smith and Jimmie Lewis Smith v. Methodist Hospitals Memphis, Keith G. Anderson, M.D. and The Sutherland Clinic, Inc., F/K/A Cardiology Consultants of Memphis
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1999)
Rebecca Woody v. A.W. Chesterton Company
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2008)
Legislative History
Acts 1968, ch. 575, § 2; impl. am. Acts 1980, ch. 534, § 1; T.C.A. § 23-3102; 1999, ch. 433, §§ 1, 2.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 29-1-101
Application of equitable remedies§ 29-1-102
Injunction pending litigation§ 29-1-103
Receivers pending litigation§ 29-1-104
Receiver's bond§ 29-1-106
Judges granting extraordinary process§ 29-1-107
Statement as to first application§ 29-1-108
Application after refusal§ 29-1-109
Endorsement of refusal§ 29-1-110
Transmission of bill and fiat to clerk§ 29-1-111
Scope of provisions§ 29-10-101
Chapter definitions§ 29-10-103
Enforcement of chapterCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Tennessee § 29-11-102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/tn/29-11-102.