Tennessee Statutes
§ 27-9-111 — Hearing - Findings
Tennessee § 27-9-111
JurisdictionTennessee
Title27
This text of Tennessee § 27-9-111 (Hearing - Findings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tenn. Code Ann. § 27-9-111 (2026).
Text
(a)At the expiration of ninety (90) days from the filing of the transcript, the cause shall stand for trial, and shall be heard and determined at the earliest practical date, as one having precedence over other litigation, except suits involving state, county or municipal revenue.
(b)The hearing shall be on the proof introduced before the board or commission contained in the transcript, and upon such other evidence as either party may desire to introduce.
(c)The judge shall reduce all findings of fact and conclusions of law to writing and make them parts of the record.
(d)In making such findings of fact, the judge shall weigh the evidence and determine the facts by the preponderance of the proof.
(e)If the final decision of a board or commission revokes, suspends, or denies a license
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Deja Vu of Nashville, Inc., a Tennessee Corporation Jerry C. Pendergrass v. The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee
421 F.3d 417 (Sixth Circuit, 2005)
Jeffries v. Tennessee Department of Correction
108 S.W.3d 862 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2002)
Deja Vu of Nashville, Inc. v. Metropolitan Government
466 F.3d 391 (Sixth Circuit, 2006)
East Brooks Books, Inc. v. City of Memphis
633 F.3d 459 (Sixth Circuit, 2011)
600 Marshall Entertainment Concepts, LLC v. City of Memphis
375 F. App'x 513 (Sixth Circuit, 2010)
Turnbull Preservation Group, L.L.C. v. Dickson County, Tennessee
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2022)
City of Chattanooga v. Cinema 1, Inc.
150 S.W.3d 390 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2004)
Hemontolor v. WILSON CTY. BD. ZON. APPLS.
883 S.W.2d 613 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1994)
City of Chattanooga v. Cinema , Inc.
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2004)
B & B Enterprises of Wilson Co., LLC v. City of Lebanon
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2004)
Wireless Properties, LLC v. The Board of Appeals for the City of Chattanooga
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2009)
Hilton Jeffries v. TDOC
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2002)
Jeffery Walton v. Tennessee Department of Correction
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2016)
D'Army Bailey v. Shelby County, Tennessee
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2013)
City of Knoxville v. The City of Knoxville Pension Board
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2012)
Arthur McRae v. Knox County
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2004)
Andrew Bernard Shute, Jr. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville, Davidson County, Tennessee
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2010)
John Seals v. James Bowlen, Warden
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1999)
Deja Vu of Nashville v. Metro Gvt Nash
(Sixth Circuit, 2005)
Legislative History
Code 1932, § 9014; Acts 1951, ch. 261, § 1; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 27-911; Acts 1987, ch. 28, §§ 1-3; 1998, ch. 794, § 1; 2002, ch. 615, § 1.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 27-1-113
Findings of fact - Scope of review§ 27-1-114
Filing of findings§ 27-1-118
Written opinions in supreme court§ 27-1-119
Opinions furnished to counsel§ 27-1-122
Damages for frivolous appeal§ 27-1-123
Notice of appeal not jurisdictional§ 27-2-101
Number of new trials in jury cases§ 27-3-128
Remand for correction of recordCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Tennessee § 27-9-111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/tn/27-9-111.