§ 23-25-10. Applicator categories for certification — Standards.
(a) The director shall adopt applicator categories established by EPA by regulation and
may establish additional categories and subcategories for certification necessary
for the administration and enforcement of this chapter. Separate subcategories may
be specified as to ground, aerial, or manual methods used to apply pesticides or to
the use of pesticides to control insects, plant diseases, rodents, or weeds. Each
category or subcategory shall be subject to separate testing procedures and requirements;
provided, that no person shall be required to pay an additional fee if that
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
§ 23-25-10. Applicator categories for certification — Standards.
(a) The director shall adopt applicator categories established by EPA by regulation and
may establish additional categories and subcategories for certification necessary
for the administration and enforcement of this chapter. Separate subcategories may
be specified as to ground, aerial, or manual methods used to apply pesticides or to
the use of pesticides to control insects, plant diseases, rodents, or weeds. Each
category or subcategory shall be subject to separate testing procedures and requirements;
provided, that no person shall be required to pay an additional fee if that person
desires to be certified in more than one category or subcategory.
(b) The director, in promulgating regulations under this chapter, shall adopt or prescribe
standards of competency for the certification of applicators which are at least equal
to those established by EPA. Those standards may relate to the use and handling of
pesticides or to the use and handling of the pesticide or class of pesticides covered
by the individual's certification and shall be relative to the hazards involved. In
determining standards, the director shall consider the characteristics of the pesticide
formulation such as: the acute dermal and inhalation toxicity; the persistence, mobility,
and susceptibility to biological concentration; the use experience which may reflect
an inherent misuse or an unexpected good safety record which does not always follow
laboratory toxicological information; the relative hazards of patterns of use such
as granular soil applications, ultra low volume of dust aerial applications, or air
blast sprayer applications; and the extent of the intended use.