Oregon Statutes

§ 659A.186 — Exclusivity of provisions; construction; concurrent leave

Oregon § 659A.186
JurisdictionOregon
Vol.16
Title 51Labor and Employment; Unlawful Discrimination
Ch. 659AUnlawful Discrimination in Employment, Public Accommodations and Real

This text of Oregon § 659A.186 (Exclusivity of provisions; construction; concurrent leave) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Or. Rev. Stat. § 659A.186 (2026).

Text

(1)ORS 659A.150 to 659A.186 do not limit any right of an employee to any leave that is similar to the leave described in ORS 659A.159 (1) and to which the employee may be entitled under any agreement between the employer and the employee, collective bargaining agreement or employer policy.
(2)ORS 659A.150 to 659A.186 shall be construed to the extent possible in a manner that is consistent with any similar provisions of the federal Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993. If family leave taken under ORS 659A.150 to 659A.186 qualifies as protected leave pursuant to the federal Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (P.L. 103-3), family leave taken under ORS 659A.150 to 659A.186 must be taken concurrently with, and not in addition to, any leave taken under the federal Family and Medical Leave Ac

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sanders v. City of Newport
657 F.3d 772 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
154 case citations
Yeager v. Providence Health System Oregon
96 P.3d 862 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2004)
32 case citations
Ossanna v. Nike, Inc.
445 P.3d 281 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2019)
29 case citations
Perez-Denison v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Northwest
868 F. Supp. 2d 1065 (D. Oregon, 2012)
27 case citations
McCauley v. ASML US, Inc.
917 F. Supp. 2d 1143 (D. Oregon, 2013)
5 case citations
Phillips v. Pacificorp
304 F. App'x 527 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
4 case citations
Denny v. Union Pacific Railroad
173 F. App'x 549 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
2 case citations
Kelly v. Boeing Company
(D. Oregon, 2019)
Sanders v. City of Newport
602 F. Supp. 2d 1195 (D. Oregon, 2009)
Mike Wellington v. Lane County
460 F. App'x 690 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Michael Kelly v. Boeing Company
(Ninth Circuit, 2021)

Legislative History

Formerly 659.494; 2013 c.384 §6; 2023 c.203 §8; 2024 c.20 §19

Nearby Sections

15
§ 659A.001
Definitions
§ 659A.004
Short title
§ 659A.036
Short title
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Oregon § 659A.186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/or/659A.186.