New York § 9-709 Priority

New York Statutes

§ 9-709 — Priority

New York § 9-709

Law UCCUniform Commercial Code

Part 7Transition

Art. 9Secured Transactions

This text of New York § 9-709 (Priority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

N.Y. Uniform Commercial Code § 9-709 (2026).

Text

Section 9--709. Priority.\n  (a) Law governing priority. Revised Article 9 determines the priority\nof conflicting claims to collateral. However, if the relative priorities\nof the claims were established before Revised Article 9 takes effect,\nFormer Article 9 determines priority.\n  (b) Priority if security interest becomes enforceable under Section\n9--203. For purposes of Section 9--322(a), the priority of a security\ninterest that becomes enforceable under Section 9--203 of Revised\nArticle 9 dates from the time Revised Article 9 takes effect if the\nsecurity interest is perfected under Revised Article 9 by the filing of\na financing statement before Revised Article 9 takes effect which would\nnot have been effective to perfect the security interest under Former\nArticle 9. This subse

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Section 9--709. Priority.\n (a) Law governing priority. Revised Article 9 determines the priority\nof conflicting claims to collateral. However, if the relative priorities\nof the claims were established before Revised Article 9 takes effect,\nFormer Article 9 determines priority.\n (b) Priority if security interest becomes enforceable under Section\n9--203. For purposes of Section 9--322(a), the priority of a security\ninterest that becomes enforceable under Section 9--203 of Revised\nArticle 9 dates from the time Revised Article 9 takes effect if the\nsecurity interest is perfected under Revised Article 9 by the filing of\na financing statement before Revised Article 9 takes effect which would\nnot have been effective to perfect the security interest under Former\nArticle 9. This subsection does not apply to conflicting security\ninterests each of which is perfected by the filing of such a financing\nstatement.\n