New York Statutes
§ 755 — When punishment may be summary
§ 755. When punishment may be summary. Where the offense is committed\nin the immediate view and presence of the court, or of the judge or\nreferee, upon a trial or hearing, it may be punished summarily. For that\npurpose, an order must be made by the court, judge, or referee, stating\nthe facts which constitute the offense and which bring the case within\nthe provisions of this section, and plainly and specifically prescribing\nthe punishment to be inflicted therefor. Such order is reviewable by a\nproceeding under article seventy-eight of the civil practice law and\nrules.\n
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
New York § 755 (When punishment may be summary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Julie G. v. Yu-Jen G.
81 A.D.3d 1079 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Samuelsen v. Samuelsen
124 A.D.2d 650 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Loeber v. Teresi
256 A.D.2d 747 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Kunstler v. Galligan
168 A.D.2d 146 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
The People v. Tyrone Sweat
23 N.E.3d 955 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)
Michael N. G. v. Elsa R.
233 A.D.2d 264 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
In re Hart
849 N.E.2d 946 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
Pronti v. Allen
13 A.D.3d 1034 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Kelly v. Kelly
34 A.D.3d 809 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Brostoff v. Berkman
170 A.D.2d 364 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Shockome v. Shockome
30 A.D.3d 529 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Eaton v. Eaton
46 A.D.3d 1432 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Pozefsky v. Jung
268 A.D.2d 646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
O'Connell v. Taddeo
174 Misc. 2d 110 (New York Supreme Court, 1997)
Scott v. Coleman
20 A.D.3d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Proper v. Proper
144 A.D.2d 712 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Doyle v. Aison
216 A.D.2d 634 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
In re Jamie D.
293 A.D.2d 278 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Dobozin v. Tills
6 A.D.3d 1220 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Roberto M. v. Melanie D-B.
34 A.D.3d 284 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)