New York Statutes
§ 395 — Required disclosure of prior use
§ 395. Required disclosure of prior use.
1.Whenever any person, firm,\ncorporation or association engaged in the business of retailing\nmerchandise to the public, or agent, employee or sales representative\nthereof shall offer used, rebuilt, reconditioned or repossessed\ntelevision or radio receiving sets, phonographs, or major household\nappliances, for sale to the public, the seller shall affix to such\nmerchandise offered for sale a tag or sticker which shall state as\nappropriate that such merchandise has been used, rebuilt, reconditioned,\nrepossessed, or rebranded and used. If such merchandise is offered for\nsale to the public by any means of advertisement, announcement, card,\nsign, label, tag or other means of communication, the said\nadvertisement, announcement, card, sign, l
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
New York § 395 (Required disclosure of prior use) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
National Convention Services, L.L.C. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co.
239 F. Supp. 3d 761 (S.D. New York, 2017)
Mendez v. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.
746 F. Supp. 2d 575 (S.D. New York, 2010)
Schlessinger v. Valspar Corp.
991 N.E.2d 190 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)
Schlessinger v. Valspar Corp.
686 F.3d 81 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Hering v. Lighthouse 2001, LLC
21 A.D.3d 449 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Salamone v. Oak Park Marina, Inc.
259 A.D.2d 987 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Brown v. New York Design Ctr., Inc.
185 N.Y.S.3d 97 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Adams v. Oak Park Marina, Inc.
261 A.D.2d 903 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Thomas v. Northeast Theatre Corp.
51 A.D.3d 588 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Topor v. State
176 Misc. 2d 177 (New York State Court of Claims, 1997)
Waiting Room Solutions v. Excelsior Insurance Company
(S.D. New York, 2020)
Ho v. Onefinestay
(S.D. New York, 2020)
People v. Ceselka
195 Misc. 2d 442 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 2003)
S&P Assoc. of N.Y. LLC v. Dewald
2024 NY Slip Op 32187(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 390-A
Optical discs; requirements§ 390-B
Anti-phishing act of 2006§ 390-BB
Cramming prohibited§ 390-E*2
Skimming awareness notice§ 391-C
Sale of bicycles