New York Statutes
§ 779 — Jurisdiction and supervision of respondent placed on probation; failure to comply with terms of probation
New York § 779
JurisdictionNew York
Law FCTFamily Court Act
Part 7Compliance With Orders
Art. 7Proceedings Concerning Whether a Person Is In Need of Supervision
This text of New York § 779 (Jurisdiction and supervision of respondent placed on probation; failure to comply with terms of probation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
N.Y. Family Court Act § 779 (2026).
Text
§ 779. Jurisdiction and supervision of respondent placed on probation;\nfailure to comply with terms of probation.
(a)A respondent who is\nplaced on probation in accordance with section seven hundred fifty-seven\nof this article shall remain under the legal jurisdiction of the court\npending expiration or termination of the period of probation.\n (b) The probation service shall supervise the respondent during the\nperiod of such legal jurisdiction.\n (c) A respondent brought before the court for failure to comply with\nreasonable terms and conditions of an order of probation issued under\nsection seven hundred fifty-seven of this article shall be subject to\nsection seven hundred seventy-nine-a of this article. If, after a\nhearing pursuant to such section, the court determines by com
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Matthew L.
65 A.D.3d 315 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
In re Dominique R.
57 A.D.3d 550 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
In re Brittny MM.
51 A.D.3d 1303 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
In re Gregory M.
131 Misc. 2d 942 (NYC Family Court, 1986)
In re Daniel JJ.
31 A.D.3d 930 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
In re Draielle P.
47 A.D.3d 937 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
In re Casey VV.
3 A.D.3d 785 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re Arsenio M.
51 A.D.3d 670 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
In re Timothy T.
216 A.D.2d 959 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
In re Roxanne ZZ.
27 A.D.3d 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
In re Willie J.
76 A.D.2d 1075 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
In re Jessica L.
96 A.D.3d 848 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
In re Michael S.
100 A.D.3d 1530 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
In re Catherine B.
115 A.D.3d 741 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
In re Sean T.
302 A.D.2d 990 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re Daniel XX.
149 A.D.3d 1231 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
In re Tiffany S.
254 A.D.2d 817 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
S., JR., MICHAEL, MTR. OF
(Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Nearby Sections
10
§ 775
Order on hearingCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
New York § 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ny/779.