S., JR., MICHAEL, MTR. OF

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 16, 2012
DocketCAF 12-00203
StatusPublished

This text of S., JR., MICHAEL, MTR. OF (S., JR., MICHAEL, MTR. OF) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
S., JR., MICHAEL, MTR. OF, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1180 CAF 12-00203 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL S., JR., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. --------------------------------- MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MONROE COUNTY ATTORNEY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

TANYA J. CONLEY, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, ROCHESTER, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAM K. TAYLOR, COUNTY ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (SCOTT WILLIAM WESTERVELT OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Joan S. Kohout, J.), entered December 29, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 7. The order, among other things, placed respondent in the custody of the Commissioner of Health and Human Services of Monroe County for a period of 12 months.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is granted and the petition is dismissed.

Memorandum: Respondent appeals from a dispositional order entered in a violation of probation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act § 779. The order revoked respondent’s probation and imposed a placement outside of his home for a period of 12 months. Respondent’s appeal from the dispositional order brings up for review the denial of respondent’s motion to dismiss the violation petition (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; Matter of James L. [appeal No. 2], 74 AD3d 1775, 1775). We conclude that Family Court erred in denying that motion. In the absence of the filing of a declaration of delinquency pursuant to Family Court Act § 779-a, which tolls a disposition of probation pending a final determination on the violation petition, the court’s authority to enter a dispositional order expired on the date on which the order of probation expired (see §§ 779, 779-a).

Entered: November 16, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 779
New York § 779
§ 5501
New York CVP § 5501
§ 779
New York FCT § 779

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
S., JR., MICHAEL, MTR. OF, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/s-jr-michael-mtr-of-nyappdiv-2012.