Nebraska Statutes

§ 77-801 — Public service entity; furnish information; confidentiality; Property Tax Administrator; duties

Nebraska § 77-801
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 77Revenue and Taxation

This text of Nebraska § 77-801 (Public service entity; furnish information; confidentiality; Property Tax Administrator; duties) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-801 (2026).

Text

(1)All public service entities shall, on or before April 15 of each year, furnish a statement specifying such information as may be required by the Property Tax Administrator on forms prescribed by the Tax Commissioner to determine and distribute the entity's total taxable value including the franchise value. All information reported by the public service entities, not available from any other public source, and any memorandum thereof shall be confidential and available to taxing officials only. For good cause shown, the Property Tax Administrator may allow an extension of time in which to file such statement. Such extension shall not exceed fifteen days after April 15.
(2)The returns of public service entities shall not be held to be conclusive as to the taxable value of the property, b

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Northern Natural Gas Co. v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment
443 N.W.2d 249 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
39 case citations
Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. State Board of Equalization
466 N.W.2d 461 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1991)
26 case citations
Trailblazer Pipeline Co. v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment
442 N.W.2d 386 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
8 case citations
John Day Co. v. Douglas County Board of Equalization
497 N.W.2d 65 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1993)
5 case citations
Mid-America Pipeline Co. v. Boehm
506 N.W.2d 41 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1993)
3 case citations
Amoco Pipeline Co. v. State Board of Equalization
494 N.W.2d 541 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1993)
Arapahoe Telephone Co. v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment
466 N.W.2d 81 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1991)
Clarks Telephone Co. v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment
471 N.W.2d 753 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1991)
Dial-Net, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment
471 N.W.2d 752 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1991)
Opinion No. (1991)
(Nebraska Attorney General Reports, 1991)
Wauneta Telephone Co. v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment
471 N.W.2d 754 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1991)

Legislative History

Source: Laws 1903, c. 73, § 68, p. 408; Laws 1903, c. 73, § 76, p. 411; Laws 1903, c. 73, § 80, p. 412; Laws 1911, c. 104, § 6, p. 373; R.S.1913, §§ 6358, 6366, 6370; Laws 1921, c. 133, art. IX, § 1, p. 586; C.S.1922, § 5890; C.S.1929, § 77-801; R.S.1943, § 77-801; Laws 1981, LB 179, § 8; Laws 1983, LB 353, § 1; Laws 1985, LB 269, § 2; Laws 1995, LB 490, § 87; Laws 1997, LB 270, § 37; Laws 2000, LB 968, § 38; Laws 2004, LB 973, § 13; Laws 2009, LB166, § 7; Laws 2015, LB259, § 7; Laws 2020, LB1107, § 123. Annotations: Examples of property subject to valuation by the Tax Commissioner include railroad personal property and public service entities, including pipelines. John Day Co. v. Douglas Cty. Bd. of Equal., 243 Neb. 24, 497 N.W.2d 65 (1993). Corporation owning and operating hydro-electric power plant, selling electric energy at its generator, is subject to franchise tax hereunder. Northern Nebraska Power Co. v. Holt County, 120 Neb. 724, 235 N.W. 92 (1931). Occupation tax and tax upon gross receipts are not double taxation. Nebraska Tel. Co. v. City of Lincoln, 82 Neb. 59, 117 N.W. 284 (1908). Value of whole property of telegraph company as an entirety should be considered, and the relation which the value of the property in the taxing district bears to the value of the entire property. Western U. T. Co. v. Dodge County, 80 Neb. 18, 113 N.W. 805 (1907). All items taken together going to make up value of business as going concern should be considered. Nebraska Tel. Co. v. Hall County, 75 Neb. 405, 106 N.W. 471 (1906). Taxation of franchises must be by valuation and in proportion to value, and gross receipts alone are not proper measure of value. Western U. T. Co. v. City of Omaha, 73 Neb. 527, 103 N.W. 84 (1905). Gross receipts refers only to gross receipts for business within state. State ex rel. Breckenridge v. Fleming, 70 Neb. 529, 97 N.W. 1063 (1903). State statute imposing franchise tax on corporation's intangible property in state is not invalid for failure to prescribe method of assessment and taxation, and corporate taxpayer could not object that it failed to provide for allocation and distribution of tax to counties. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Weaver, 5 F.Supp. 493 (D. Neb. 1932).

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 77-801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/77-801.