Nebraska Statutes

§ 48-1229 — Terms, defined

Nebraska § 48-1229

This text of Nebraska § 48-1229 (Terms, defined) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1229 (2026).

Text

For purposes of the Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act, unless the context otherwise requires:

(1)Employee means any individual permitted to work by an employer pursuant to an employment relationship or who has contracted to sell the goods or services of an employer and to be compensated by commission. Services performed by an individual for an employer shall be deemed to be employment, unless it is shown that (a) such individual has been and will continue to be free from control or direction over the performance of such services, both under his or her contract of service and in fact, (b) such service is either outside the usual course of business for which such service is performed or such service is performed outside of all the places of business of the enterprise for which such s

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fisher v. PayFlex Systems USA
829 N.W.2d 703 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2013)
135 case citations
Pick v. Norfolk Anesthesia, PC
755 N.W.2d 382 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2008)
59 case citations
Professional Business Services Co. v. Rosno
680 N.W.2d 176 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2004)
31 case citations
Timberlake v. Douglas County
291 Neb. 387 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2015)
22 case citations
Schaffart v. Oneok, Inc.
686 F.3d 461 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)
17 case citations
Schlotfeld v. Mel's Heating and Air Conditioning
445 N.W.2d 918 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
8 case citations
Manuel Acosta v. Tyson Foods
800 F.3d 468 (Eighth Circuit, 2015)
8 case citations
Gomez v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
799 F.3d 1192 (Eighth Circuit, 2015)
6 case citations
Roseland v. Strategic Staff Management, Inc.
708 N.W.2d 841 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2006)
4 case citations
Baouch v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.
244 F. Supp. 3d 980 (D. Nebraska, 2017)
1 case citations
Jenkins v. WorldCom, Inc.
96 F. Supp. 2d 936 (D. Nebraska, 1999)
1 case citations
Coffey v. Planet Group
(Nebraska Supreme Court, 2014)
Drought v. Marsh
304 Neb. 860 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2020)
Mejia v. Chapman
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2015)
von Kuhn v. Gavilon Agriculture Inv.
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2025)

Legislative History

Source: Laws 1977, LB 220A, § 2; Laws 1988, LB 1130, § 1; Laws 1989, LB 238, § 1; Laws 1991, LB 311, § 1; Laws 1993, LB 121, § 300; Laws 1999, LB 753, § 1; Laws 2007, LB255, § 2; Laws 2014, LB765, § 1. Annotations: 1. Vacation and sick leave 2. Consideration as wages 3. Miscellaneous 1. Vacation and sick leave Former employees were not entitled to paid time off compensation under the Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act where they did not meet the written employment agreement's stated conditions to earn paid time off. Drought v. Marsh, 304 Neb. 860, 937 N.W.2d 229 (2020). Under the 2007 amendments to this section, unused "paid time off" hours constitute unused vacation leave when the only stipulated condition for earning the hours is the rendering of services and an employee has an absolute right to take this time off for any purpose that he or she wishes. In that circumstance, an employee's unused paid time off hours are wages that an employer must pay upon separation of employment. Fisher v. PayFlex Systems USA, 285 Neb. 808, 829 N.W.2d 703 (2013). The Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act does not prohibit an employer from providing a sick leave benefit which may be used only in the event of illness or injury and which has no monetary value upon termination of employment if it is not so used. Loves v. World Ins. Co., 277 Neb. 359, 773 N.W.2d 348 (2009). The Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act does not prohibit an employer from providing a sick leave benefit which may be used only in the event of illness or injury and which has no monetary value upon termination of employment if it is not so used. Loves v. World Ins. Co., 276 Neb. 936, 758 N.W.2d 640 (2008). Under the plain language of subsection (4) of this section, unused sick leave is not a part of wages payable to a separating employee unless there is a specific agreement otherwise. Loves v. World Ins. Co., 276 Neb. 936, 758 N.W.2d 640 (2008). Accrued vacation time, which is part of an employment agreement, is due and payable as wages upon termination of employment. Roseland v. Strategic Staff Mgmt., 272 Neb. 434, 722 N.W.2d 499 (2006). 2. Consideration as wages An appellate court will consider a payment a wage subject to the Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act if (1) it is compensation for labor or services, (2) it was previously agreed to, and (3) all the conditions stipulated have been met. Timberlake v. Douglas County, 291 Neb. 387, 865 N.W.2d 788 (2015). The list of fringe benefits under the former subsection (3) of this section is not exclusive. Under the former subsection (4), "injured on duty" agreed-upon benefits for employees who are injured while performing a high-risk duty are wages that an employee can earn just by rendering the specified services. Timberlake v. Douglas County, 291 Neb. 387, 865 N.W.2d 788 (2015). A payment will be considered a wage subject to the Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act if (1) it is compensation for labor or services, (2) it was previously agreed to, and (3) all the conditions stipulated have been met. Eikmeier v. City of Omaha, 280 Neb. 173, 783 N.W.2d 795 (2010). Payments pursuant to a severance agreement that were not earned and did not accrue through continued employment are not compensation for labor or services rendered, and therefore, the employee is not entitled to attorney fees. Eikmeier v. City of Omaha, 280 Neb. 173, 783 N.W.2d 795 (2010). Pursuant to subsection (3) of this section, deferred compensation constitutes wages under the Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act. Sindelar v. Canada Transport, Inc., 246 Neb. 559, 520 N.W.2d 203 (1994). Where an employment contract provides for the sharing of possible financial losses, sums collected under such a provision are not "benefits" which could be considered "wages" under subsection (3) of this section. Brown v. Clayton Brokerage Co., 238 Neb. 646, 472 N.W.2d 381 (1991). Where an employment agreement provides for sharing of possible financial losses, sums collected under such a provision are not "benefits" which could be considered "wages" under subsection (3) of this section. Waite v. A. S. Battiato Co., 238 Neb. 151, 469 N.W.2d 766 (1991). An employee's share of the profits of his employer under a profit-sharing plan can be wages within the meaning of subsection (3) of this section. Suess v. Lee Sapp Leasing, 229 Neb. 755, 428 N.W.2d 899 (1988). Subdivision (4) of this section provides that the term "wages" includes orders on file with the employer at the time of termination of employment. Thus, an employment agreement policy which clearly conflicts with such definition of wages, even though said policy is common within the industry, is void because it is prohibited by the Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act. Sanford v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, 14 Neb. App. 908, 719 N.W.2d 312 (2006). Overtime wages can be claimed under the Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act only if those overtime wages were previously agreed to by the employer and the employee. Nonetheless, even in the absence of a previous agreement concerning overtime compensation, compensation for overtime can be claimed under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act for hours worked in excess of 40 during a given week. Freeman v. Central States Health & Life Co., 2 Neb. App. 803, 515 N.W.2d 131 (1994). 3. Miscellaneous The Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act does not represent a very clear mandate of public policy which would warrant recognition of an exception to the employment-at-will doctrine. Malone v. American Bus. Info., 262 Neb. 733, 634 N.W.2d 788 (2001). Statutory definitions applied to facts to reach conclusion that route salesman is an employee within the meaning of the Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act. Rudolf v. Tombstone Pizza Corp., 214 Neb. 276, 333 N.W.2d 673 (1983). District court erred in finding that plaintiffs were not employees under the definition provided by this section. Tracy v. Tracy, 7 Neb. App. 143, 581 N.W.2d 96 (1998).

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 48-1229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/48-1229.