Nebraska Statutes
§ 43-2932 — Parenting plan; limitations to protect child or child's parent from harm; effect of court determination; burden of proof
Nebraska § 43-2932
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 43Infants and Juveniles
This text of Nebraska § 43-2932 (Parenting plan; limitations to protect child or child's parent from harm; effect of court determination; burden of proof) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-2932 (2026).
Text
(1)When the court
is required to develop a parenting plan:
(a)If a preponderance of the evidence demonstrates, the
court shall determine whether a parent who would otherwise be allocated custody,
parenting time, visitation, or other access to the child under a parenting
plan:
(i)Has committed child abuse or neglect;
(ii)Has committed child abandonment under section 28-705 ;
(iii)Has committed domestic intimate partner abuse; or
(iv)Has interfered persistently with the other parent's
access to the child, except in the case of actions taken for the purpose of
protecting the safety of the child or the interfering parent or another family
member, pending adjudication of the facts underlying that belief; and
(b)If a parent is found to have engaged in any activity
specified by subdivisio
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hopkins v. Hopkins
883 N.W.2d 363 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2016)
Randy S. v. Nicolette G.
302 Neb. 465 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2019)
Fales v. Fales
25 Neb. Ct. App. 868 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2018)
Mann v. Mann
316 Neb. 910 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2024)
Hernandez v. Dorantes
994 N.W.2d 46 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2023)
Franklin M. v. Lauren C.
969 N.W.2d 882 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2022)
Sulzle v. Sulzle
318 Neb. 194 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2024)
Chmelka v. Chmelka
29 Neb. Ct. App. 265 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2020)
Kee v. Gilbert
992 N.W.2d 486 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2023)
Wright v. Wright
29 Neb. Ct. App. 787 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2021)
Kelly v. Kelly
29 Neb. Ct. App. 198 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2020)
Jones v. Colgrove
319 Neb. 461 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2025)
Gandara-Moore v. Moore
29 Neb. Ct. App. 101 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2020)
Blank v. Blank
303 Neb. 602 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2019)
Toro v. Toro
30 Neb. Ct. App. 158 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2021)
Bryan v. Bryan
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2022)
Cerra v. Cerra
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2025)
Crow v. Chelli
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2017)
Flores v. Flores-Guerrero
(Nebraska Supreme Court, 2015)
Herbolsheimer v. Koenig
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2014)
Legislative History
Source: Laws 2007, LB554, § 13; Laws 2008, LB1014, § 62; Laws 2014, LB853, § 26.
Cross References: Child Protection and Family Safety Act, see section 28-710.
Annotations: To meet the requirement for "special written findings" under subsection (3) of this section, the court must, at a minimum, specifically state that it finds that the children and the other parent may be adequately protected from harm by the limits the court has actually imposed in the parenting plan. The court's findings should also indicate that the court recognized that the burden on this issue was on the parent found to have committed the abuse. The court should further identify what limits it imposed in the parenting plan that it finds will provide the necessary protection. Franklin M. v. Lauren C., 310 Neb. 927, 969 N.W.2d 882 (2022). In awarding custody of a child, special written findings that a child and other parent can be adequately protected from harm are required if a parent is found to have engaged in "domestic intimate partner abuse," which means attempting to cause or intentionally and knowingly causing bodily injury with or without a dangerous instrument to a family or household member and a pattern or history of abuse. Blank v. Blank, 303 Neb. 602, 930 N.W.2d 523 (2019). Regardless of when the parent was convicted of third degree domestic assault, where the district court was presented with evidence of that conviction during modification proceedings, it was required to comply with this section in making a custody determination. Flores v. Flores-Guerrero, 290 Neb. 248, 859 N.W.2d 578 (2015). Threatening to cause or actually causing bodily injury to a spouse or former spouse qualifies as domestic intimate partner abuse. Flores v. Flores-Guerrero, 290 Neb. 248, 859 N.W.2d 578 (2015). Where a preponderance, or the greater weight, of the evidence demonstrates that a parent has committed one of the listed actions, the obligations of this section are mandatory. Flores v. Flores-Guerrero, 290 Neb. 248, 859 N.W.2d 578 (2015). The district court did not abuse its discretion by ordering therapeutic and supervised parenting time for the father. The ability to transition to unsupervised parenting time was in the father's control. He simply needed to demonstrate that he would no longer engage in manipulative or alienating behavior which adversely impacted the children's relationship with their mother. Wright v. Wright, 29 Neb. App. 787, 961 N.W.2d 834 (2021). When a parent has committed domestic intimate partner abuse, subsection (3) of this section requires the district court to make special written findings that the child and other parent can be adequately protected from harm before ordering legal or physical custody to be given to that parent. Fales v. Fales, 25 Neb. App. 868, 914 N.W.2d 478 (2018). The requirement to make special written findings that the child and the "other parent" can be adequately protected from harm if child custody is awarded to the parent with a record of domestic abuse applies to instances where domestic abuse occurred between the parents of the child or children at issue, where it is necessary to ensure that there is no future domestic abuse to the "other parent." This section does not apply to a case in which one parent's conviction for domestic abuse was the result of an incident with a prior or estranged domestic intimate partner, who is not a party in the current action. State on behalf of Dawn M. v. Jerrod M., 22 Neb. App. 835, 861 N.W.2d 755 (2015).
Nearby Sections
15
§ 43-1001
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-1002
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-1003
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-1004
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-1006
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-1007
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-1008
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-1009
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-101
Children eligible for adoption§ 43-101.01
Terms, defined§ 43-1010
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-1011
Interstate Compact for Juveniles§ 43-102.01
Military personnel; deemed residents; whenCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 43-2932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/43-2932.