Nebraska Statutes
§ 43-274 — County attorney; city attorney; preadjudication powers and duties; petition, pretrial diversion, or restorative justice practice or service; transfer; procedures; appeal; admission, confession, or statement made by juvenile; inadmissible; when
Nebraska § 43-274
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 43Infants and Juveniles
This text of Nebraska § 43-274 (County attorney; city attorney; preadjudication powers and duties; petition, pretrial diversion, or restorative justice practice or service; transfer; procedures; appeal; admission, confession, or statement made by juvenile; inadmissible; when) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-274 (2026).
Text
(1)The county attorney or city attorney, having knowledge of a juvenile within his or her jurisdiction who appears to be a juvenile described in subdivision (1), (2), (3)(b), or (4) of section 43-247 and taking into consideration the criteria in section 43-276 , may proceed as provided in this section.
(2)The county attorney or city attorney may offer pretrial diversion to the juvenile in accordance with a juvenile pretrial diversion program established pursuant to sections 43-260.02 to 43-260.07 .
(3)(a) If a juvenile appears to be a juvenile described in subdivision (1), (2), (3)(b), or (4) of section 43-247 , the county attorney or city attorney may utilize restorative justice practices or services as a form of, or condition of, diversion or plea bargaining or as a recommendati
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Interest of Tyrone K.
887 N.W.2d 489 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2016)
State v. Steven S. (In Re Steven S.)
299 Neb. 447 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)
In re Interest of Nizigiyimana R.
889 N.W.2d 362 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2016)
In Re Interest of Rondell B.
546 N.W.2d 801 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1996)
In re Interest of Sandrino T.
888 N.W.2d 371 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2016)
Lisa v. v. STEVEN S.
529 N.W.2d 805 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1995)
In Re Interest of Juan L.
577 N.W.2d 319 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1998)
State v. Karen D.
526 N.W.2d 439 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1994)
In Re Interest of Joeylann H.
574 N.W.2d 185 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1998)
In re Interest of Violet T.
286 Neb. 949 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2013)
In re Interest of Steven S.
299 Neb. 447 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)
State, Department of Social Services v. Kevin T.
546 N.W.2d 77 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1996)
In Re Interest of Jamie P.
670 N.W.2d 814 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2003)
In re Interest of Jorge A.
990 N.W.2d 560 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2023)
In re Interest of William E.
29 Neb. Ct. App. 44 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2020)
Ackerman v. Nanfito
510 N.W.2d 333 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1993)
In re Interest of Luis D.
29 Neb. Ct. App. 495 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2021)
In re Interest of Aaden S.
33 Neb. Ct. App. 777 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2025)
In re Interest of Anfernee W.
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2023)
In re Interest of Jovani L.
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2025)
Legislative History
Source: Laws 1981, LB 346, § 30; Laws 1987, LB 638, § 4; Laws 1998, LB 1073, § 20; Laws 2003, LB 43, § 13; Laws 2014, LB464, § 16; Laws 2017, LB11, § 2; Laws 2019, LB595, § 28; Laws 2024, LB184, § 2.
Annotations: An order granting transfer from juvenile court to county court or district court is reviewed de novo on the record for an abuse of discretion. In re Interest of Steven S., 299 Neb. 447, 908 N.W.2d 391 (2018). In determining whether a case should be transferred from juvenile court to criminal court, a juvenile court should consider those factors set forth in section 43-276; there are no weighted factors and no prescribed method by which more or less weight is assigned to a specific factor. In re Interest of Steven S., 299 Neb. 447, 908 N.W.2d 391 (2018). Actions involving juveniles fitting into categories under section 43-246.01(3) may be initiated either in the juvenile court or in the county or district court and may be transferred as provided in this section. In re Interest of Luis D., 29 Neb. App. 495, 956 N.W.2d 25 (2021). When the prosecution seeks to transfer a juvenile offender's case to criminal court, the juvenile court must retain the matter unless a preponderance of the evidence shows that the proceeding should be transferred to the county court or district court. The prosecution has the burden by a preponderance of the evidence to show why such proceeding should be transferred. In re Interest of William E., 29 Neb. App. 44, 950 N.W.2d 392 (2020). The mandate that allegations under section 43-247(1), (2), and (4) be made with the same specificity as a criminal complaint merely reconciles the pleading practice regarding juvenile offenders with that of adult criminals. In re Interest of Taeven Z., 19 Neb. App. 831, 812 N.W.2d 313 (2012). The pleading standard for allegations under section 43-247(3) stems from the requirements of due process, and the factual allegations must give a parent notice of the bases for seeking to prove that the child is within the meaning of section 43-247(3)(a). In re Interest of Taeven Z., 19 Neb. App. 831, 812 N.W.2d 313 (2012). A guardian ad litem appointed by the juvenile court does not have the authority to initiate a juvenile court case by filing a petition alleging that a child is within the meaning of section 43-247(3)(a). In re Interest of David M. et al., 19 Neb. App. 399, 808 N.W.2d 357 (2011). Subsection (1) of this section authorizes a county attorney with knowledge of a juvenile in his or her county falling within the purview of section 43-247(3)(a) to file a petition in that county's juvenile court. In re Interest of Tegan V., 18 Neb. App. 857, 794 N.W.2d 190 (2011). Juvenile court did not err in refusing to allow an intervenor to proceed on the intervenor's petition where there was no evidence to establish the county attorney's consent to the filing of the intervenor's petition as required by this section. In re Interest of Jamie P., 12 Neb. App. 261, 670 N.W.2d 814 (2003). A petition filed pursuant to this section, specifying facts under subsection (3)(a) of section 43-247, must allege facts which would show that a child lacks proper parental care by reason of the inadequacy of any parent whose custody or right to custody might be affected, so that both parents may understand that the litigation concerns their respective rights. In re Interest of Kelly D., 3 Neb. App. 251, 526 N.W.2d 439 (1994).
Nearby Sections
15
§ 43-1001
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-1002
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-1003
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-1004
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-1006
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-1007
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-1008
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-1009
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-101
Children eligible for adoption§ 43-101.01
Terms, defined§ 43-1010
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-1011
Interstate Compact for Juveniles§ 43-102.01
Military personnel; deemed residents; whenCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 43-274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/43-274.