Nebraska Statutes
§ 43-1508 — Placement guidelines; preferences; records
Nebraska § 43-1508
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 43Infants and Juveniles
This text of Nebraska § 43-1508 (Placement guidelines; preferences; records) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-1508 (2026).
Text
(1)In any adoptive placement of an Indian child under state law, a preference shall be given, in the absence of good cause to the contrary, to a placement with the following in descending priority order:
(a)A member of the Indian child's extended family;
(b)Other members of the Indian child's tribe or tribes;
(c)Other Indian families; or
(d)A non-Indian family committed to enabling the child to have extended family time and participation in the cultural and ceremonial events of the Indian child's tribe or tribes;
(2)Any child accepted for foster care or preadoptive placement or a voluntary foster care placement shall be placed in the least restrictive setting which most approximates a family and in which his or her special needs, if any, may be met. The child shall also be placed wit
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Interest of CW
479 N.W.2d 105 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1992)
Carson P. ex rel Foreman v. Heineman
240 F.R.D. 456 (D. Nebraska, 2007)
State v. D.W.
479 N.W.2d 105 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1992)
In re Interest of Betty Z.
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2021)
In re Interest of Lorenzo S. & Lillian S.
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2014)
In re Interest of Nery v.
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2015)
Legislative History
Source: Laws 1985, LB 255, § 8; Laws 2015, LB566, § 12.
Annotations: The lower standard of proof under subsection (3) of section 43-279.01 for the termination of parental rights to non-Indian children, as opposed to the higher standard of proof under the Nebraska Indian Child Welfare Act does not violate the equal protection rights of parents of non-Indian children. In re Interest of Phoenix L. et al., 270 Neb. 870, 708 N.W.2d 786 (2006). The placement preferences delineated in this section may yield to the wishes of the parent or for other good causes shown. In re Interest of C.W. et al., 239 Neb. 817, 479 N.W.2d 105 (1992). Good cause for deviation from the statutory placement preferences was not shown where the record showed that the Department of Health and Human Services was unsuccessful in locating relative placements for the children but did not detail what efforts had been made, the record did not show why the children had not been placed with intervenor grandmother, the grandmother made no argument that such placement should occur and did not assert that the children's nonrelative placements were not in their best interests, and the record did not show if the children's placements met any of the other statutory claims of preference. In re Interest of Enrique P. et al., 19 Neb. App. 778, 813 N.W.2d 513 (2012).
Nearby Sections
15
§ 43-1001
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-1002
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-1003
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-1004
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-1006
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-1007
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-1008
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-1009
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-101
Children eligible for adoption§ 43-101.01
Terms, defined§ 43-1010
Repealed. Laws 2009, LB 237, § 5§ 43-1011
Interstate Compact for Juveniles§ 43-102.01
Military personnel; deemed residents; whenCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 43-1508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/43-1508.