Nebraska Statutes

§ 25-224 — Actions on product liability

Nebraska § 25-224
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 25Courts; Civil Procedure

This text of Nebraska § 25-224 (Actions on product liability) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-224 (2026).

Text

(1)All product liability actions, except one governed by subsection (5) of this section, shall be commenced within four years next after the date on which the death, injury, or damage complained of occurs.
(2)(a) Notwithstanding subsection (1) of this section or any other statutory provision to the contrary, any product liability action, except one governed by section 2-725 , Uniform Commercial Code or by subsection (5) of this section, shall be commenced as follows:
(i)For products manufactured in Nebraska, within ten years after the date the product which allegedly caused the personal injury, death, or damage was first sold or leased for use or consumption; or
(ii)For products manufactured outside Nebraska, within the time allowed by the applicable statute of repose, if any, of the s

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Georgetowne Ltd. Partnership v. Geotechnical Services, Inc.
430 N.W.2d 34 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1988)
83 case citations
Marksmeier v. McGregor Corp.
722 N.W.2d 65 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2006)
64 case citations
Givens v. Anchor Packing, Inc.
466 N.W.2d 771 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1991)
61 case citations
Condon v. AH Robins Co., Inc.
349 N.W.2d 622 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1984)
58 case citations
City of Wood River v. Geer-Melkus Construction Co.
444 N.W.2d 305 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
52 case citations
MacKu by and Through MacKu v. Drackett Prod. Co.
343 N.W.2d 58 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1984)
48 case citations
Gillam v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
489 N.W.2d 289 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1992)
43 case citations
Divis v. Clarklift of Nebraska, Inc.
590 N.W.2d 696 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1999)
36 case citations
Farber v. Lok-N-Logs, Inc.
701 N.W.2d 368 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2005)
33 case citations
Banks v. Heineman
837 N.W.2d 70 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2013)
30 case citations
MacMillen v. AH Robins Co., Inc.
348 N.W.2d 869 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1984)
27 case citations
Lawson v. Ford Motor Co.
408 N.W.2d 256 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1987)
14 case citations
Miers v. Central Mine Equipment Co.
604 F. Supp. 502 (D. Nebraska, 1985)
10 case citations
Ag Valley Co-op v. Servinsky Engr.
974 N.W.2d 324 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2022)
7 case citations
Groth v. Sandoz, Inc.
601 F. Supp. 453 (D. Nebraska, 1984)
7 case citations
Fritchie v. Alumax Inc.
931 F. Supp. 662 (D. Nebraska, 1996)
4 case citations
Budler v. General Motors Corp.
689 N.W.2d 847 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2004)
3 case citations
Konecne v. Abram, LLC
319 Neb. 966 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2025)
2 case citations
Brown v. Eli Lilly and Co.
690 F. Supp. 857 (D. Nebraska, 1988)
1 case citations
Budler v. General Motors Corp.
252 F. Supp. 2d 874 (D. Nebraska, 2003)
1 case citations

Legislative History

Source: Laws 1978, LB 665, § 2; Laws 1981, LB 29, § 1; Laws 2001, LB 489, § 1. Annotations: 1. Constitutionality 2. Computation of time 3. Miscellaneous 1. Constitutionality Subsection (2) of this section is constitutional. Gillam v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 241 Neb. 414, 489 N.W.2d 289 (1992). Nebraska's products liability 10-year statute of repose does not violate the Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses of the Nebraska or U.S. Constitutions and does not violate the open courts provision of the Nebraska Constitution. Radke v. H.C. Davis Sons' Mfg. Co., 241 Neb. 21, 486 N.W.2d 204 (1992). The 10-year period of repose contained in this section is constitutional. Spilker v. City of Lincoln, 238 Neb. 188, 469 N.W.2d 546 (1991). 2. Computation of time Subsection (2) of this section is not tolled by a person's status as a minor pursuant to section 25-213. Budler v. General Motors Corp., 268 Neb. 998, 689 N.W.2d 847 (2004). Pursuant to subsection (2) of this section, the statute of repose should be recommenced when a product has been refurbished. To determine whether a product has been refurbished, courts must first determine whether the refurbishing resulted in a "new product." To determine whether the product should be considered "new," courts must inquire whether the refurbishing has lengthened the product's useful life beyond what was contemplated when the product was first sold. Second, even if the product is considered "new," the suit will still be time barred unless the refurbishing was defective and proximately caused the injury. Divis v. Clarklift of Nebraska, Inc., 256 Neb. 384, 590 N.W.2d 696 (1999). The 10-year statute of repose found in subsection (2) of this section begins to run when the product is first relinquished for use or consumption. Where the injury occurs within the 10-year period, and a claimant commences his or her action after the 10 years have passed, an action accrues but is barred. Where the injury occurs outside the 10-year period, no substantive cause of action ever accrues, and a claimant's actions are likewise barred. Gillam v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 241 Neb. 414, 489 N.W.2d 289 (1992). The 1981 amendment to subsections (2) and (5) of this section cannot be retroactively applied to revive causes of action which had been extinguished by the provisions of the 1978 enactment of subsection (2) of this section. Immunity granted by a completed statutory bar is a vested right which cannot be impaired by a subsequent legislative act. Givens v. Anchor Packing, 237 Neb. 565, 466 N.W.2d 771 (1991). Time periods for bringing suit are extended by section 25-213. Lawson v. Ford Motor Co., 225 Neb. 725, 408 N.W.2d 256 (1987). The statute of repose applicable to the manufacturer of an allegedly defective product is contained in this section and begins to run when possession of the product is first relinquished for ultimate use or consumption, not when it is first placed into the stream of commerce by the manufacturer. Witherspoon v. Sides Constr. Co., 219 Neb. 117, 362 N.W.2d 35 (1985). One who wrongfully conceals a material fact necessary to the accrual of a cause of action against him, and such concealment causes the opposite party to delay the filing of suit, cannot avail himself of the statute of limitations as a defense. MacMillen v. A. H. Robins Co., 217 Neb. 338, 348 N.W.2d 869 (1984). The 4-year statute of limitations begins to run on the date on which the party who holds the cause of action discovers, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the existence of the injury or damage. Condon v. A. H. Robins Co., 217 Neb. 60, 349 N.W.2d 622 (1984). Regarding an infant's cause of action for products liability, section 25-213 tolls the statute of limitations contained in subsection (4) of this section. Macku v. Drackett Products Co., 216 Neb. 176, 343 N.W.2d 58 (1984). 3. Miscellaneous Because the repose provisions in this section apply to "product liability actions," they necessarily apply to claims against manufacturers, sellers, and lessors of products. Ag Valley Co-op v. Servinsky Engr., 311 Neb. 665, 974 N.W.2d 324 (2022). "The product," as used in this section, refers to the completed product that is placed on the market and sold or leased for consumer use, and necessarily includes all of the product's original component parts. Ag Valley Co-op v. Servinsky Engr., 311 Neb. 665, 974 N.W.2d 324 (2022). The effect of the 10-year statute of repose in subsection (2) of this section can be to prevent what might otherwise be a cause of action from ever arising. Farber v. Lok-N-Logs, Inc., 270 Neb. 356, 701 N.W.2d 368 (2005). The language, "first sold or leased for use or consumption," contained in subsection (2) of this section refers to when a product is first surrendered or relinquished to the individual or entity. Farber v. Lok-N-Logs, Inc., 270 Neb. 356, 701 N.W.2d 368 (2005). Upon the passage of the 10-year repose period in subsection (2) of this section, the defendant acquires a substantive right protected by statute. Farber v. Lok-N-Logs, Inc., 270 Neb. 356, 701 N.W.2d 368 (2005). When a party brings a suit which is characterized as a suit in tort alleging negligence in the performance of a contract, the applicable statute of limitations is that which is applied to actions in tort. Thomas v. Countryside of Hastings, 246 Neb. 907, 524 N.W.2d 311 (1994).

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 25-224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/25-224.