This text of North Dakota § 4.1-59-05 (Grain marketing - Procedure for resolving disputes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
1.If a dispute or disagreement arises between the person receiving and the person
delivering grain as to the proper grade, dockage, vomitoxin level, moisture content, or
protein content of any grain, an average sample of at least three pints [1.65 liters] of
the grain in dispute may be taken together by both interested parties.
a.The sample must be certified by each party as a true and representative sample
of the grain in dispute on the day the grain was transferred.
b.The sample must be forwarded in a suitable container by parcel post or express,
prepaid with the name and address of both parties for inspection by a federal
licensed inspector, or a mutually agreed-upon third party, that may examine the
grain and adjudge what grade, dockage, vomitoxin level, moisture content, or
protein
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1. If a dispute or disagreement arises between the person receiving and the person
delivering grain as to the proper grade, dockage, vomitoxin level, moisture content, or
protein content of any grain, an average sample of at least three pints [1.65 liters] of
the grain in dispute may be taken together by both interested parties.
a. The sample must be certified by each party as a true and representative sample
of the grain in dispute on the day the grain was transferred.
b. The sample must be forwarded in a suitable container by parcel post or express,
prepaid with the name and address of both parties for inspection by a federal
licensed inspector, or a mutually agreed-upon third party, that may examine the
grain and adjudge what grade, dockage, vomitoxin level, moisture content, or
protein content the sample of grain is entitled to under the inspection rules and
grades adopted by the secretary of agriculture of the United States.
c. The person requesting the inspection service shall pay for the inspection.
d. If the grain in question is damp, otherwise out of condition, or if moisture content
is in dispute, the sample must be placed in an airtight container.
e. Payment for the grain involved in the dispute must be made and accepted on the
basis of the determination made by the federal licensed inspector or third party.
All quality factors also may be considered in determining the price of the grain.
f. An appeal of the determination made by a third party other than a federal
licensed inspector may be made to a federal licensed inspector.
g. An appeal of the determination made by a federal licensed inspector may be
made as provided under the United States Grain Standards Act [Pub. L. 103-354;
108 Stat. 3237; 7 U.S.C. 79(c) and (d)] and under 7 CFR 800.125-800.140.
h. A person not abiding by a final determination is liable for damage resulting from
not abiding by the determination.
2. If a dispute or disagreement arises between the person delivering grain and the
person receiving grain as to the determination of quality factors of grain purchased or
delivered in the state for which inspection rules and grades have not been adopted by
the secretary of agriculture of the United States, an average sample of at least three
pints [1.65 liters] of the grain in dispute may be taken together by the interested
parties.
a. The sample must be certified by each party as a true and representative sample
of the grain in dispute on the day the grain was transferred.
b. If the grain is damp or otherwise out of condition, the sample must be placed in
an airtight container.
c. The sample must be forwarded in a suitable container by parcel post or express,
prepaid with the name and address of both parties, for inspection by a federal
licensed inspector, or a mutually agreed-upon third party, that may examine the
grain and determine the quality factors in dispute.
d. The person requesting the inspection service shall pay for the inspection.
e. The determination made by the inspector, or the third party, must be used in the
settlement of the dispute.