North Dakota Statutes
§ 28-32-13 — Substantial compliance with rulemaking procedure
A rule is invalid unless adopted in substantial compliance with this chapter. However,
inadvertent failure to supply any person with a notice required by section 28-32-10 does not
invalidate a rule. Notwithstanding subsection 2 of section 28-32-42, an action to contest the
validity of a rule on the grounds of noncompliance with this chapter may not be commenced
more than two years after the effective date of the rule.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
North Dakota § 28-32-13 (Substantial compliance with rulemaking procedure) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thompson v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation Bureau
490 N.W.2d 248 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1992)
Feist v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
1997 ND 177 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1997)
Scott v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
1998 ND 221 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1998)
Saakian v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
1998 ND 227 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1998)
Blanchard v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
1997 ND 118 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1997)
F.O.E. Aerie 2337 v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
464 N.W.2d 197 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1990)
Singha v. North Dakota State Board of Medical Examiners
1998 ND 42 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1998)
Kraft v. North Dakota State Board of Nursing
2001 ND 131 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2001)
Evans v. Backes
437 N.W.2d 848 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1989)
Sjostrand v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
2002 ND 125 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2002)
Lamplighter Lounge v. State Ex Rel. Heitkamp
510 N.W.2d 585 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1994)
Holen v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
2000 ND 145 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2000)
Gullickson v. Gullickson
1998 ND 207 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1998)