North Carolina § 1D-35 Punitive damages awards

North Carolina Statutes

§ 1D-35 — Punitive damages awards

North Carolina § 1D-35

Ch. 1DPunitive Damages

This text of North Carolina § 1D-35 (Punitive damages awards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1D-35 (2026).

Text

In determining the amount of punitive damages, if any, to be awarded, the trier of fact:

(1)Shall consider the purposes of punitive damages set forth in G.S. 1D-1; and

(2)May consider only that evidence that relates to the following: a. The reprehensibility of the defendant's motives and conduct. b. The likelihood, at the relevant time, of serious harm. c. The degree of the defendant's awareness of the probable consequences of its conduct. d. The duration of the defendant's conduct. e. The actual damages suffered by the claimant. f. Any concealment by the defendant of the facts or consequences of its conduct. g. The existence and frequency of any similar past conduct by the defendant. h. Whether the defendant profited from the conduct. i. The defendant's ability to pay punitive damages,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In determining the amount of punitive damages, if any, to be awarded, the trier of fact:
(1) Shall consider the purposes of punitive damages set forth in G.S. 1D-1; and
(2) May consider only that evidence that relates to the following:
a. The reprehensibility of the defendant's motives and conduct.
b. The likelihood, at the relevant time, of serious harm.
c. The degree of the defendant's awareness of the probable consequences of its conduct.
d. The duration of the defendant's conduct.
e. The actual damages suffered by the claimant.
f. Any concealment by the defendant of the facts or consequences of its conduct.
g. The existence and frequency of any similar past conduct by the defendant.
h. Whether the defendant profited from the conduct.
i. The defendant's ability to pay punitive damages, as evidenced by its revenues or net worth. (1995, c. 514, s. 1.)