Minnesota § 327C.10 DEFENSES TO EVICTION

Minnesota Statutes

§ 327C.10 — DEFENSES TO EVICTION

Minnesota § 327C.10

PartTRADE REGULATIONS, CONSUMER PROTECTION

Ch. 327CMANUFACTURED HOME PARKS

This text of Minnesota § 327C.10 (DEFENSES TO EVICTION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Minn. Stat. § 327C.10 (2026).

Text

Subdivision 1.Nonpayment of rent. In any action to recover possession for failure to pay rent, it shall be a defense that the sum allegedly due contains a charge which violates section327C.03, or that the park owner has injured the defendant by failing to comply with section504B.161. Subd. 2.Nonpayment of rent increase. In any action to recover possession for failure to pay a rent increase, it shall be a defense that the park owner:

(1)failed to comply with the provisions of section327C.06, subdivision 1or 3;

(2)increased the rent in violation of section327C.06, subdivision 2. Subd. 3.Rule violations. In any action to recover possession for the violation of a park rule, it shall be a defense that the rule allegedly violated is unreasonable. Subd. 4.Retaliatory conduct. In any action

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Subdivision 1.Nonpayment of rent.
In any action to recover possession for failure to pay rent, it shall be a defense that the sum allegedly due contains a charge which violates section327C.03, or that the park owner has injured the defendant by failing to comply with section504B.161.

Subd. 2.Nonpayment of rent increase.
In any action to recover possession for failure to pay a rent increase, it shall be a defense that the park owner:
(1) failed to comply with the provisions of section327C.06, subdivision 1or 3;
(2) increased the rent in violation of section327C.06, subdivision 2.

Subd. 3.Rule violations.
In any action to recover possession for the violation of a park rule, it shall be a defense that the rule allegedly violated is unreasonable.

Subd. 4.Retaliatory conduct.
In any action to recover possession it shall be a defense that the park owner has violated section327C.12.