Minnesota § 327C.12 RETALIATORY CONDUCT PROHIBITED

Minnesota Statutes

§ 327C.12 — RETALIATORY CONDUCT PROHIBITED

Minnesota § 327C.12

PartTRADE REGULATIONS, CONSUMER PROTECTION

Ch. 327CMANUFACTURED HOME PARKS

This text of Minnesota § 327C.12 (RETALIATORY CONDUCT PROHIBITED) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Minn. Stat. § 327C.12 (2026).

Text

A park owner may not increase rent, decrease services, alter an existing rental agreement or seek to recover possession or threaten such action in whole or in part as a penalty for a resident's:

(1)good faith complaint to the park owner or to a government agency or official;

(2)good faith attempt to exercise rights or remedies pursuant to state or federal law; or

(3)joining and participating in the activities of a resident association as defined under section327C.015, subdivision 15. In any proceeding in which retaliatory conduct is alleged, the burden of proving otherwise shall be on the park owner if the owner's challenged action began within 90 days after the resident engaged in any of the activities identified in clause (1), (2), or (3). If the challenged action began more than 90 d

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A park owner may not increase rent, decrease services, alter an existing rental agreement or seek to recover possession or threaten such action in whole or in part as a penalty for a resident's:
(1) good faith complaint to the park owner or to a government agency or official;
(2) good faith attempt to exercise rights or remedies pursuant to state or federal law; or
(3) joining and participating in the activities of a resident association as defined under section327C.015, subdivision 15.
In any proceeding in which retaliatory conduct is alleged, the burden of proving otherwise shall be on the park owner if the owner's challenged action began within 90 days after the resident engaged in any of the activities identified in clause (1), (2), or (3). If the challenged action began more than 90 days after the resident engaged in the protected activity, the party claiming retaliation must make a prima facie case. The park owner must then prove otherwise.