Kansas Statutes
§ 84-9-201 — General effectiveness of security agreement
(a)General effectiveness. Except as otherwise provided in the uniform commercial code, a security agreement is effective according to its terms between the parties, against purchasers of the collateral, and against creditors.
(b)Applicable consumer laws and other law. A transaction subject to this article is subject to any applicable rule of law which establishes a different rule for consumers, to any other statute or rule and regulation of this state that regulates the rates, charges, agreements, and practices for loans, credit sales, or other extensions of credit, and to any consumer protection statute or rule and regulation of this state and, including, but not limited to, K.S.A. 2-1319, 2-2608, 2-3007, 34-239, 47-836, 58-201, 58-203, 58-204, 58-207, 58-218, 58-220, 58-221, 58-241, 58
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kansas § 84-9-201 (General effectiveness of security agreement) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Farmers State Bank v. Cooper
608 P.2d 929 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1980)
FARMERS STATE BK. v. Production Cred. Ass'n of St. Cloud
755 P.2d 518 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1988)
Clark Jewelers v. Satterthwaite
662 P.2d 1301 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1983)
Tuloka Affiliates, Inc. v. Security State Bank
627 P.2d 816 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1981)
First National Bank v. Southwestern Livestock, Inc.
616 F. Supp. 1515 (D. Kansas, 1985)
Bank of Kansas v. Hutchinson Health Services, Inc.
735 P.2d 256 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1987)
Speth v. Whitham Farms Feedyard, L.P. (In Re Sunbelt Grain WKS, LLC)
427 B.R. 896 (D. Kansas, 2010)
Commerce Bank, N.A. v. Chrysler Realty Corp.
76 F. Supp. 2d 1113 (D. Kansas, 1999)
Emmons v. LeMaster, Inc.
10 P.3d 33 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2000)
Moritz Implement Co. v. Matthews
959 P.2d 886 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1998)
Coats State Bank v. Grey (In Re Grey)
29 B.R. 286 (D. Kansas, 1983)
Transport Acceptance Corp. v. Fothergill (In re Key Truck Leasing, Inc.)
9 B.R. 837 (D. Kansas, 1981)
Legislative History
L. 2000, ch. 142, § 11; L. 2007, ch. 90, § 66; July 1, 2008.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 84-1-101
Short titles§ 84-1-102
Scope of article§ 84-1-104
Construction against implied repeal§ 84-1-105
Severability§ 84-1-106
Use of singular and plural; gender§ 84-1-107
Section captions§ 84-1-201
General definitions§ 84-1-202
Notice; knowledge§ 84-1-204
Value§ 84-1-205
Reasonable time; seasonableness§ 84-1-206
Presumptions