Kansas Statutes
§ 26-504 — Same; findings; order appointing appraisers; duties; appeals to supreme court, when
Kansas § 26-504
This text of Kansas § 26-504 (Same; findings; order appointing appraisers; duties; appeals to supreme court, when) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kan. Stat. Ann. § 26-504 (2026).
Text
If the judge to whom the proceeding has been assigned finds from the petition:
(1)The plaintiff has the power of eminent domain; and (2) the taking is necessary to the lawful corporate purposes of the plaintiff, the judge shall entertain suggestions from any party in interest relating to the appointment of appraisers and the judge shall enter an order appointing three disinterested residents of the county in which the petition is filed, at least two of the three of whom shall have experience in the valuation of real estate, to view and appraise the value of the lots and parcels of land found to be necessary, and to determine the damages and compensation to the interested parties resulting from the taking. Such order shall also fix the time for the filing of the appraisers' report at a tim
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Harsch v. Miller
200 P.3d 467 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2009)
City of Wichita v. Sealpak Co.
112 P.3d 125 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2005)
City of Wichita v. McDonald's Corp.
971 P.2d 1189 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1999)
Union Gas System, Inc. v. Carnahan
774 P.2d 962 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1989)
Young Partners, LLC v. Board of Education
160 P.3d 830 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2007)
In Re Condemnation of Land for State Highway Purposes
683 P.2d 1247 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1984)
City of Roeland Park v. Jasan Trust
132 P.3d 943 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2006)
Landau Investment Co. v. City of Overland Park
930 P.2d 1065 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1997)
Miller v. Preisser
284 P.3d 290 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2012)
Steele v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
659 P.2d 217 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1983)
City of Kansas v. Taylor
213 B.R. 21 (D. Kansas, 1997)
Van Horn v. City of Kansas City
819 P.2d 624 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1991)
Legislative History
L. 1963, ch. 234, § 4; L. 1999, ch. 111, § 1; L. 2004, ch. 110, § 6; July 1.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 26-201
Cities; authority to condemn; interest acquired; resolution, notice, ordinance; exercise of power§ 26-206a
Application to urban renewal law§ 26-401
Procedure for taking stones§ 26-402
Damages paid by contractor§ 26-501
Eminent domain procedure; venue§ 26-502
Contents of petition§ 26-503
Eminent domain procedure; noticeCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Kansas § 26-504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ks/26-504.