Kansas Statutes
§ 26-501 — Eminent domain procedure; venue
Kansas § 26-501
This text of Kansas § 26-501 (Eminent domain procedure; venue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kan. Stat. Ann. § 26-501 (2026).
Text
(b)The proceedings shall be brought by filing a verified petition in the district court of the county in which the real estate is situated, except if it be an entire tract situated in two or more counties, the proceedings may be brought in any county in which any tract or parts thereof is situated.
(c)For the purposes of the eminent domain procedure act, unless the context clearly indicates a different meaning, the following terms shall have the following respective meanings:
(1)"Municipality" means city, county or unified government.
(2)"Taking" means the use by any authorized entity o
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
City of Wichita v. 200 South Broadway, Ltd. Partnership
855 P.2d 956 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1993)
Harsch v. Miller
200 P.3d 467 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2009)
– GFTLenexa, LLC v. City of Lenexa –
453 P.3d 304 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2019)
Miller v. Bartle
150 P.3d 1282 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2007)
Butler County Rural Water District No. 8 v. Yates
64 P.3d 357 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2003)
City of Wichita v. Eisenring
7 P.3d 1248 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2000)
General Building Contractors, L.L.C. v. Board of Shawnee County Commissioners
66 P.3d 873 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2003)
McAlister v. City of Fairway
212 P.3d 184 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2009)
Miller v. GLACIER DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC
161 P.3d 730 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2007)
Ben J. v. City of Salina
208 P.3d 739 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2009)
Ellis v. City of Kansas City
589 P.2d 552 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1979)
City of Olathe v. Stott
861 P.2d 1287 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1993)
Estate of Kirkpatrick v. City of Olathe
215 P.3d 561 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2009)
City of Wichita v. Sealpak Co.
112 P.3d 125 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2005)
City of Wichita v. Denton
294 P.3d 207 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2013)
City of Manhattan v. Kent
618 P.2d 1180 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1980)
Continental Coal, Inc. v. Cunningham
511 F. Supp. 2d 1065 (D. Kansas, 2007)
Mid Gulf, Inc. v. Bishop
792 F. Supp. 1205 (D. Kansas, 1992)
In Re Condemnation of Land for State Highway Purposes
683 P.2d 1247 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1984)
City of Roeland Park v. Jasan Trust
132 P.3d 943 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2006)
Legislative History
L. 1963, ch. 234, § 1; L. 2006, ch. 192, § 5; July 1, 2007.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 26-201
Cities; authority to condemn; interest acquired; resolution, notice, ordinance; exercise of power§ 26-206a
Application to urban renewal law§ 26-401
Procedure for taking stones§ 26-402
Damages paid by contractor§ 26-501
Eminent domain procedure; venue§ 26-502
Contents of petition§ 26-503
Eminent domain procedure; noticeCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Kansas § 26-501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ks/26-501.