Idaho Statutes
§ 28-2-202 — FINAL WRITTEN EXPRESSION — PAROL OR EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE
Idaho § 28-2-202
JurisdictionIdaho
Title 28COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS
Part 2.FORM, FORMATION AND READJUSTMENT OF CONTRACT
Ch. 2UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — SALES
This text of Idaho § 28-2-202 (FINAL WRITTEN EXPRESSION — PAROL OR EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Idaho Code § 28-2-202 (2026).
Text
Terms with respect to which the confirmatory memoranda of the parties agree or which are otherwise set forth in a writing intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreement with respect to such terms as are included therein may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement but may be explained or supplemented
(a)By course of performance, course of dealing, or usage of trade (section 28-1-303); and
(b)By evidence of consistent additional terms unless the court finds the writing to have been intended also as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Borah v. McCandless
205 P.3d 1209 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2009)
Anderson & Nafziger v. G. T. Newcomb, Inc.
595 P.2d 709 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1979)
United States v. Mary Floyd
1 F.3d 867 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Glenn Dick Equipment Co. v. Galey Construction, Inc.
541 P.2d 1184 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1975)
Interform Co. v. Mitchell
575 F.2d 1270 (Ninth Circuit, 1978)
Paloukos v. Intermountain Chevrolet Co.
588 P.2d 939 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1978)
Herrick v. Leuzinger
900 P.2d 201 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1995)
Chapman v. Haney Seed Co., Inc.
624 P.2d 408 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1981)
Airstream, Inc. v. CIT Financial Services, Inc.
723 P.2d 851 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1986)
Gebrueder Heidemann, K.G. v. A.M.R. Corp.
688 P.2d 1180 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1984)
Idaho Falls Bonded Produce & Supply Co. v. General Mills Restaurant Group, Inc.
665 P.2d 1056 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1983)
Ace Supply, Inc. v. Rocky-Mountain MacHinery Co.
525 P.2d 965 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1974)
Brewer v. Pitkin
577 P.2d 1162 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1978)
Hoff Companies, Inc. v. Danner
822 P.2d 558 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1991)
Posey v. Ford Motor Credit Co.
111 P.3d 162 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 2005)
Performance Chevrolet, Inc. v. Market Scan Information Systems, Inc.
402 F. Supp. 2d 1166 (D. Idaho, 2005)
Valley Bank v. Estate of Rainsdon
793 P.2d 1257 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1990)
MWI Veterinary Supply Co. v. Wotton
896 F. Supp. 2d 905 (D. Idaho, 2012)
Interform Company v. Leslie L. Mitchell, D/B/A Mitchell Construction Company, and St. Paul Fire& Marine Insurance Company, Interform Company v. Leslie L. Mitchell, D/B/A Mitchell Construction Company, and St. Paul Fire& Marine Insurance Company
575 F.2d 1270 (Ninth Circuit, 1978)
Sbp Lllp v. Hoffman Construction Company
(Ninth Circuit, 2023)
Legislative History
[28-2-202, added 1967, ch. 161, sec. 2-202, p. 351; am. 2004, ch. 43, sec. 29, p. 152.]
Nearby Sections
15
§ 28-1-101
SHORT TITLES§ 28-1-102
SCOPE OF CHAPTER§ 28-1-104
CONSTRUCTION AGAINST IMPLIED REPEAL§ 28-1-105
SEVERABILITY§ 28-1-106
USE OF SINGULAR AND PLURAL — GENDER§ 28-1-107
SECTION CAPTIONS§ 28-1-201
GENERAL DEFINITIONS§ 28-1-202
NOTICE — KNOWLEDGE§ 28-1-204
VALUE§ 28-1-205
REASONABLE TIME — SEASONABLENESS§ 28-1-206
PRESUMPTIONSCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Idaho § 28-2-202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/id/28-2-202.