Idaho § 20-1010 COMMISSION RULINGS AT A PAROLE REVOCATION HEARING

Idaho Statutes

§ 20-1010 — COMMISSION RULINGS AT A PAROLE REVOCATION HEARING

Idaho § 20-1010

Title 20STATE PRISON AND COUNTY JAILS

Ch. 10IDAHO COMMISSION OF PARDONS AND PAROLE

This text of Idaho § 20-1010 (COMMISSION RULINGS AT A PAROLE REVOCATION HEARING) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Idaho Code § 20-1010 (2026).

Text

(1)After a factual parole revocation hearing has been concluded, the commissioner or commissioners or the designated hearing officer, having heard the matter, shall render a decision within twenty (20) days. If the alleged parole violator waives the parole hearing pursuant to the provisions of section 20-1009 (3), Idaho Code, then a decision shall be entered upon acceptance of the waiver.

(2)If the commissioner or commissioners or hearing officer, having heard the matter, should conclude that the allegations of violation of the conditions of parole have not been proven by a preponderance of the evidence, or those that have been proven by a preponderance of the evidence are not sufficient cause for the revocation of parole, then the parolee shall be reinstated on parole on the same or mod

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(1) After a factual parole revocation hearing has been concluded, the commissioner or commissioners or the designated hearing officer, having heard the matter, shall render a decision within twenty (20) days. If the alleged parole violator waives the parole hearing pursuant to the provisions of section 20-1009 (3), Idaho Code, then a decision shall be entered upon acceptance of the waiver.
(2) If the commissioner or commissioners or hearing officer, having heard the matter, should conclude that the allegations of violation of the conditions of parole have not been proven by a preponderance of the evidence, or those that have been proven by a preponderance of the evidence are not sufficient cause for the revocation of parole, then the parolee shall be reinstated on parole on the same or modified conditions of parole.
(3) If the commissioner or commissioners or hearing officer, having heard the matter, should conclude that the allegations of violation of the conditions of parole have been proven by a preponderance of the evidence and constitute sufficient cause for the revocation of parole, then a dispositional hearing shall be convened during a regular session of the commission to impose any sanctions up to and including executing an order of parole revocation and determine the period of time the parole violator shall be returned to state custody.

Legislative History

[(20-1010) 20-229B, added 1970, ch. 105, sec. 5, p. 263; am. 1994, ch. 171, sec. 6, p. 386; am. 2014, ch. 150, sec. 17, p. 429; am. 2015, ch. 295, sec. 1, p. 1173; am. 2016, ch. 267, sec. 1, p. 719; am. 2017, ch. 182, sec. 5, p. 420; am. and redesig. 2021, ch. 196, sec. 12, p. 533.]