Idaho Statutes
§ 19-2603 — PRONOUNCEMENT AND EXECUTION OF JUDGMENT AFTER VIOLATION OF PROBATION
Idaho § 19-2603
JurisdictionIdaho
Title 19CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Ch. 26SUSPENSION OF JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE AND PAROLE OFFENDERS
This text of Idaho § 19-2603 (PRONOUNCEMENT AND EXECUTION OF JUDGMENT AFTER VIOLATION OF PROBATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Idaho Code § 19-2603 (2026).
Text
When the court finds that the defendant has violated the terms and conditions of probation, it may, if judgment has been withheld, pronounce any judgment which it could originally have pronounced, or, if judgment was originally pronounced but suspended, revoke probation. The time such person shall have been at large under such suspended sentence shall not be counted as a part of the term of his sentence. The defendant shall receive credit for time served from the date of service of a bench warrant issued by the court after a finding of probable cause to believe the defendant has violated a condition of probation, for any time served following an arrest of the defendant pursuant to section 20-227, Idaho Code, and for any time served as a condition of probation under the withheld judgment or
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Andrew Dallas Morgan
288 P.3d 835 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 2012)
Franklin v. State
392 P.2d 552 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1964)
Peltier v. State
808 P.2d 373 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1991)
State v. Aaron Louis Bitkoff
336 P.3d 817 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 2014)
State v. Albertson
23 P.3d 797 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 2001)
51884 State v. Vega
(Idaho Court of Appeals, 2025)
Church v. Wasden
(D. Idaho, 2022)
Duaine Fredrick Earl v. State
(Idaho Court of Appeals, 2013)
Jay Wayne Newberry v. State
(Idaho Court of Appeals, 2017)
State Dakota J. Smith
(Idaho Court of Appeals, 2017)
State v. Adam Archie R. Costin
(Idaho Court of Appeals, 2012)
State v. Adam Barth
(Idaho Court of Appeals, 2016)
State v. Adam, II
(Idaho Court of Appeals, 2018)
State v. Adam Lehi Pelton
(Idaho Court of Appeals, 2014)
State v. Adam Wendell Harper
(Idaho Court of Appeals, 2015)
State v. Adekusibe Mark Onibokun
(Idaho Court of Appeals, 2012)
State v. Adrian Lamont Gunn
(Idaho Court of Appeals, 2010)
State v. Adrienne Moore
(Idaho Court of Appeals, 2017)
State v. Aldena Jo Al-Tememy
(Idaho Court of Appeals, 2016)
State v. Alejandro Cortez Estrada
(Idaho Court of Appeals, 2013)
Legislative History
[(19-2603) 1915, ch. 104, part of sec. 1, p. 245; reen. C.L., sec. 8001; C.S., sec. 9045; I.C.A., sec. 19-2505; am. 2015, ch. 99, sec. 2, p. 240.]
Nearby Sections
15
§ 19-1001
CHALLENGE — BY WHOM MADE§ 19-1002
GROUNDS FOR CHALLENGE TO PANEL§ 19-1004
FORM OF CHALLENGE§ 19-1005
DECISION UPON CHALLENGE§ 19-1009
OBJECTIONS MUST BE BY CHALLENGE§ 19-1010
APPOINTMENT OF FOREMAN§ 19-1011
OATH OF FOREMAN§ 19-1012
OATH OF JURORS§ 19-1013
CHARGE TO JURY§ 19-1014
RETIREMENT AND DISCHARGE OF JURYCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Idaho § 19-2603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/id/19-2603.