Idaho § 19-1003 GROUNDS FOR CHALLENGE TO INDIVIDUAL JURORS

Idaho Statutes

§ 19-1003 — GROUNDS FOR CHALLENGE TO INDIVIDUAL JURORS

Idaho § 19-1003

Title 19CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Ch. 10FORMATION OF GRAND JURY

This text of Idaho § 19-1003 (GROUNDS FOR CHALLENGE TO INDIVIDUAL JURORS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Idaho Code § 19-1003 (2026).

Text

A challenge to an individual grand juror may be interposed for one or more of the following causes:

1.That he is a minor.

2.That he is an alien.

3.That he is insane.

4.That he is a prosecutor upon a charge against the defendant.

5.That he is a witness on the part of the prosecution, and has been served with process or bound by an undertaking as such.

6.That he has formed or expressed an unqualified opinion or belief that the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the offense charged; but a hypothetical opinion, founded on hearsay or information supposed to be true, unaccompanied with malice or ill will, shall not disqualify a grand juror or be a cause of challenge.

7.That a state of mind exists on his part in reference to the case, or to either party, which satisfies the court that he

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A challenge to an individual grand juror may be interposed for one or more of the following causes:
1. That he is a minor.
2. That he is an alien.
3. That he is insane.
4. That he is a prosecutor upon a charge against the defendant.
5. That he is a witness on the part of the prosecution, and has been served with process or bound by an undertaking as such.
6. That he has formed or expressed an unqualified opinion or belief that the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the offense charged; but a hypothetical opinion, founded on hearsay or information supposed to be true, unaccompanied with malice or ill will, shall not disqualify a grand juror or be a cause of challenge.
7. That a state of mind exists on his part in reference to the case, or to either party, which satisfies the court that he cannot act impartially and without prejudice to the substantial rights of the party challenging.