Georgia Statutes
§ 9-11-42 — Consolidation; severance
Georgia § 9-11-42
JurisdictionGeorgia
Title9
This text of Georgia § 9-11-42 (Consolidation; severance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
O.C.G.A. § 9-11-42 (2026).
Text
(a)Consolidation. When actions involving a common question of law or fact are pending before the court, if the parties consent, the court may order a joint hearing or trial of any or all the matters in issue in the actions; it may order all the actions consolidated; and it may make such orders concerning proceedings therein as may tend to avoid unnecessary costs or delay.
(b)Separate trials. The court, in furtherance of convenience or to avoid prejudice, may order a separate trial of any claim, cross-claim, counterclaim, or third-party claim, or of any separate issue, or of any number of claims, cross-claims, counterclaims, third-party claims, or issues.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Vitner v. Funk
354 S.E.2d 666 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Goss v. Total Chipping, Inc.
469 S.E.2d 855 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Cantrell v. Northeast Georgia Medical Center
508 S.E.2d 716 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)
Georgia Ports Authority v. Harris
533 S.E.2d 404 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2000)
Paine v. Nations
641 S.E.2d 180 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2006)
Morris v. Mullis
590 S.E.2d 823 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2003)
Schaffer v. Fox
693 S.E.2d 852 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2010)
Robinson v. Hall
338 S.E.2d 699 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Kaplan v. Krosco, Inc.
306 S.E.2d 88 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Ford
481 S.E.2d 6 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
First National v. Blackburn
329 S.E.2d 897 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1985)
Cochran v. Cochran
495 S.E.2d 31 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1998)
Department of Transportation v. Defoor
325 S.E.2d 863 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)
Holland v. Holland Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.
416 S.E.2d 557 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Thompson v. Moore
342 S.E.2d 27 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Shleifer v. Bridgestone-Firestone, Inc.
477 S.E.2d 405 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Management by Design, Inc. v. Lakeview Utilities, Inc.
505 S.E.2d 37 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)
Michael C. Hall v. Margaret Hill
(Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2021)
CHRISTOPHER C. ELLIOTT v. SAVANNAH INTERNATIONAL MOTORS, INC.
(Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2021)
YKH REALTY, LLC v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2024)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 9-10-10
Cash bonds permitted; docketing§ 9-10-11
When appearance bond not forfeited by failure to attend; setting aside forfeiture of appearance bond§ 9-10-113
When verification sufficient§ 9-10-130
When affidavits amendable§ 9-10-131
Bonds in judicial proceedings amendable§ 9-10-132
Amendment of misnomers on motion§ 9-10-133
Mistake by clerk or ministerial officerCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Georgia § 9-11-42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ga/9-11-42.